Commitless repos should be bare #1829
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Trusted LGTM |
tboerger
added
the
lgtm/need 1
|
LGTM |
tboerger
added
lgtm/done
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Only mark a repo as bare if commits are pushed to it, as opposed to if only tags are pushed. Fixes #1706
Also add a sanity check to
RepoRef()to avoid potential index-out-of-range error. As far as I can understand, every non-bare repo should have at least one branch, soctx.Repo.GitRepo.GetBranches()should never actually return an empty slice, but unchecked indices make me nervous.