Replace calls to xorm UseBool with Where #2237
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
LGTM |
bkcsoft
added
the
lgtm/need 1
|
LGTM |
bkcsoft
added
lgtm/done
bkcsoft
reviewed
Aug 8, 2017
| } | ||
|
|
||
| has, err := x.UseBool().Get(loginSource) | ||
| loginSource := new(LoginSource) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Go changed their idiom for allocating things to this: loginSource := &LoginSource{}
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Filter with
Whereinstead of by struct values withUseBool.Since new boolean fields can be added to a struct at any time in the future, filtering by struct with
UseBool()is dangerous, as it considers as part of the filter all bools in the struct.Coders shouldnt have to think about the impact new fields have on existing database queries.