Skip to content

Add missed transaction on setmerged #33079

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Jan 8, 2025

Conversation

lunny
Copy link
Member

@lunny lunny commented Jan 2, 2025

Follow #33045. There are two updates on Set Merged, which should be in one transaction.
This also introduced some refactors for changeissuestatus to make it more clear.

@lunny lunny added type/bug backport/v1.23 This PR should be backported to Gitea 1.23 labels Jan 2, 2025
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added the lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. label Jan 2, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added the modifies/go Pull requests that update Go code label Jan 2, 2025
@wxiaoguang
Copy link
Contributor

If it is not a bug fix, then do not backport, and #33045 isn't backported.

@wxiaoguang wxiaoguang removed the backport/v1.23 This PR should be backported to Gitea 1.23 label Jan 2, 2025
@lunny
Copy link
Member Author

lunny commented Jan 2, 2025

The missed transaction is a bug, it may result in dirty data in the database. I will backport this manually.

@GiteaBot GiteaBot added lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. and removed lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. labels Jan 3, 2025
lunny added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 6, 2025
backport from #33079 

`SetMerged` should be in a database transaction otherwise it's possible
to have dirty data.
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. and removed lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. labels Jan 8, 2025
@wolfogre wolfogre added the reviewed/wait-merge This pull request is part of the merge queue. It will be merged soon. label Jan 8, 2025
@lunny lunny enabled auto-merge (squash) January 8, 2025 02:52
@lunny lunny merged commit 67aeb1f into go-gitea:main Jan 8, 2025
26 checks passed
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added this to the 1.24.0 milestone Jan 8, 2025
@GiteaBot GiteaBot removed the reviewed/wait-merge This pull request is part of the merge queue. It will be merged soon. label Jan 8, 2025
@lunny lunny deleted the lunny/add_transaction_set_merged branch January 8, 2025 04:03
zjjhot added a commit to zjjhot/gitea that referenced this pull request Jan 10, 2025
* giteaofficial/main:
  Fix raw file API ref handling (go-gitea#33172)
  [skip ci] Updated translations via Crowdin
  Fix ACME panic (go-gitea#33178)
  Automerge supports deleting branch automatically after merging (go-gitea#32343)
  Fix branch dropdown not display ref name (go-gitea#33159)
  Add .run to gitignore (go-gitea#33175)
  Fix assignee list overlapping in Issue sidebar (go-gitea#33176)
  Fix pam auth test regression (go-gitea#33169)
  Move repo size to sidebar (go-gitea#33155)
  Fix fuzz test (go-gitea#33156)
  Refactor older tests to use testify (go-gitea#33140)
  [skip ci] Updated translations via Crowdin
  Fix typo in gitea downloader test and add missing codebase in `ToGitServiceType` (go-gitea#33146)
  Fix form width (go-gitea#33151)
  Convert github.com/xanzy/go-gitlab into gitlab.com/gitlab-org/api/client-go (go-gitea#33126)
  Refactor HTMLFormat, update chroma render, fix js error (go-gitea#33136)
  Add missed transaction on setmerged (go-gitea#33079)
@go-gitea go-gitea locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 8, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. modifies/go Pull requests that update Go code type/bug
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants