Closed
Description
govulncheck version
Go: go1.22.8
Scanner: [email protected]
DB: https://vuln.go.dev
DB updated: 2024-10-30 21:28:25 +0000 UTC
Does this issue reproduce at the latest version of golang.org/x/vuln?
Yes
Output of go env
in your module/workspace:
GO111MODULE=''
GOARCH='arm64'
GOBIN=''
GOCACHE='/Users/cbandy/Library/Caches/go-build'
GOENV='/Users/cbandy/Library/Application Support/go/env'
GOEXE=''
GOEXPERIMENT=''
GOFLAGS=''
GOHOSTARCH='arm64'
GOHOSTOS='darwin'
GOINSECURE=''
GOMODCACHE='/Users/cbandy/go/pkg/mod'
GONOPROXY=''
GONOSUMDB=''
GOOS='darwin'
GOPATH='/Users/cbandy/go'
GOPRIVATE=''
GOPROXY='https://proxy.golang.org,direct'
GOROOT='/Users/cbandy/.local/go'
GOSUMDB='sum.golang.org'
GOTMPDIR=''
GOTOOLCHAIN='auto'
GOTOOLDIR='/Users/cbandy/.local/go/pkg/tool/darwin_arm64'
GOVCS=''
GOVERSION='go1.22.8'
GCCGO='gccgo'
AR='ar'
CC='clang'
CXX='clang++'
CGO_ENABLED='1'
GOMOD='/Users/cbandy/tmp/go.mod'
GOWORK=''
CGO_CFLAGS='-O2 -g'
CGO_CPPFLAGS=''
CGO_CXXFLAGS='-O2 -g'
CGO_FFLAGS='-O2 -g'
CGO_LDFLAGS='-O2 -g'
PKG_CONFIG='pkg-config'
GOGCCFLAGS='-fPIC -arch arm64 -pthread -fno-caret-diagnostics -Qunused-arguments -fmessage-length=0 -ffile-prefix-map=/var/folders/b2/6dgjh_xn1xs_zmnnkrkhs9rh0000gn/T/go-build3343678873=/tmp/go-build -gno-record-gcc-switches -fno-common'
What did you do?
Run govulncheck in an empty project.
cd $(mktemp -d)
go mod init tmp
govulncheck -format sarif ./...
What did you see happen?
The scan finished and found no vulnerabilities, but the SARIF report contains no runs.results
field.
{
"version": "2.1.0",
"$schema": "https://json.schemastore.org/sarif-2.1.0.json",
"runs": [
{
"tool": {
"driver": {
"name": "govulncheck",
"semanticVersion": "v1.1.3",
"informationUri": "https://pkg.go.dev/golang.org/x/vuln/cmd/govulncheck",
"properties": {
"protocol_version": "v1.0.0",
"scanner_name": "govulncheck",
"scanner_version": "v1.1.3",
"db": "https://vuln.go.dev",
"db_last_modified": "2024-10-30T21:28:25Z",
"go_version": "go1.22.8",
"scan_level": "symbol",
"scan_mode": "source"
}
}
}
}
]
}
What did you expect to see?
I expected a "results": []
field, as described by the SARIF spec.
If the tool failed to start, … then
results
MAY be present. If it is present, its value SHALL benull
.
If the tool started but failed to begin its analysis… then againresults
MAY be present, and if present SHALL benull
.In all other circumstances,
results
SHALL be present and SHALL contain all results detected by the tool. If the tool did not detect any results,results
SHALL be an empty array.