Skip to content

archive/tar: use built-in clear to simplify code #66158

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

apocelipes
Copy link
Contributor

@apocelipes apocelipes commented Mar 7, 2024

No description provided.

@gopherbot
Copy link
Contributor

This PR (HEAD: a0a0856) has been imported to Gerrit for code review.

Please visit Gerrit at https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/569696.

Important tips:

  • Don't comment on this PR. All discussion takes place in Gerrit.
  • You need a Gmail or other Google account to log in to Gerrit.
  • To change your code in response to feedback:
    • Push a new commit to the branch used by your GitHub PR.
    • A new "patch set" will then appear in Gerrit.
    • Respond to each comment by marking as Done in Gerrit if implemented as suggested. You can alternatively write a reply.
    • Critical: you must click the blue Reply button near the top to publish your Gerrit responses.
    • Multiple commits in the PR will be squashed by GerritBot.
  • The title and description of the GitHub PR are used to construct the final commit message.
    • Edit these as needed via the GitHub web interface (not via Gerrit or git).
    • You should word wrap the PR description at ~76 characters unless you need longer lines (e.g., for tables or URLs).
  • See the Sending a change via GitHub and Reviews sections of the Contribution Guide as well as the FAQ for details.

@gopherbot
Copy link
Contributor

Message from Gopher Robot:

Patch Set 1:

(1 comment)


Please don’t reply on this GitHub thread. Visit golang.org/cl/569696.
After addressing review feedback, remember to publish your drafts!

@gopherbot
Copy link
Contributor

Message from kyose chang:

Patch Set 1:

(1 comment)


Please don’t reply on this GitHub thread. Visit golang.org/cl/569696.
After addressing review feedback, remember to publish your drafts!

@gopherbot
Copy link
Contributor

Message from qiulaidongfeng:

Patch Set 1: Commit-Queue+1


Please don’t reply on this GitHub thread. Visit golang.org/cl/569696.
After addressing review feedback, remember to publish your drafts!

@gopherbot
Copy link
Contributor

Message from Go LUCI:

Patch Set 1:

Dry run: CV is trying the patch.

Bot data: {"action":"start","triggered_at":"2024-03-07T08:58:23Z","revision":"5a5aa5d51078584f7bdd22b83ce0716d695aebfb"}


Please don’t reply on this GitHub thread. Visit golang.org/cl/569696.
After addressing review feedback, remember to publish your drafts!

@gopherbot
Copy link
Contributor

Message from qiulaidongfeng:

Patch Set 1: -Commit-Queue


Please don’t reply on this GitHub thread. Visit golang.org/cl/569696.
After addressing review feedback, remember to publish your drafts!

@gopherbot
Copy link
Contributor

Message from Go LUCI:

Patch Set 1:

This CL has passed the run


Please don’t reply on this GitHub thread. Visit golang.org/cl/569696.
After addressing review feedback, remember to publish your drafts!

@gopherbot
Copy link
Contributor

Message from Go LUCI:

Patch Set 1: LUCI-TryBot-Result+1


Please don’t reply on this GitHub thread. Visit golang.org/cl/569696.
After addressing review feedback, remember to publish your drafts!

@gopherbot
Copy link
Contributor

Message from qiulaidongfeng:

Patch Set 1:

(1 comment)


Please don’t reply on this GitHub thread. Visit golang.org/cl/569696.
After addressing review feedback, remember to publish your drafts!

@gopherbot
Copy link
Contributor

Message from kyose chang:

Patch Set 1:

(1 comment)


Please don’t reply on this GitHub thread. Visit golang.org/cl/569696.
After addressing review feedback, remember to publish your drafts!

@gopherbot
Copy link
Contributor

Message from qiulaidongfeng:

Patch Set 1:

(1 comment)


Please don’t reply on this GitHub thread. Visit golang.org/cl/569696.
After addressing review feedback, remember to publish your drafts!

@apocelipes apocelipes force-pushed the feat-tar-use-clear branch from a0a0856 to 1743014 Compare March 7, 2024 12:30
@gopherbot
Copy link
Contributor

This PR (HEAD: 1743014) has been imported to Gerrit for code review.

Please visit Gerrit at https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/569696.

Important tips:

  • Don't comment on this PR. All discussion takes place in Gerrit.
  • You need a Gmail or other Google account to log in to Gerrit.
  • To change your code in response to feedback:
    • Push a new commit to the branch used by your GitHub PR.
    • A new "patch set" will then appear in Gerrit.
    • Respond to each comment by marking as Done in Gerrit if implemented as suggested. You can alternatively write a reply.
    • Critical: you must click the blue Reply button near the top to publish your Gerrit responses.
    • Multiple commits in the PR will be squashed by GerritBot.
  • The title and description of the GitHub PR are used to construct the final commit message.
    • Edit these as needed via the GitHub web interface (not via Gerrit or git).
    • You should word wrap the PR description at ~76 characters unless you need longer lines (e.g., for tables or URLs).
  • See the Sending a change via GitHub and Reviews sections of the Contribution Guide as well as the FAQ for details.

@gopherbot
Copy link
Contributor

Message from kyose chang:

Patch Set 1:

(1 comment)


Please don’t reply on this GitHub thread. Visit golang.org/cl/569696.
After addressing review feedback, remember to publish your drafts!

@gopherbot
Copy link
Contributor

Message from qiulaidongfeng:

Patch Set 3: Code-Review+1

(1 comment)


Please don’t reply on this GitHub thread. Visit golang.org/cl/569696.
After addressing review feedback, remember to publish your drafts!

@gopherbot
Copy link
Contributor

Message from Ian Lance Taylor:

Patch Set 3: Auto-Submit+1 Code-Review+2 Commit-Queue+1

(1 comment)


Please don’t reply on this GitHub thread. Visit golang.org/cl/569696.
After addressing review feedback, remember to publish your drafts!

@gopherbot
Copy link
Contributor

Message from Go LUCI:

Patch Set 3:

Dry run: CV is trying the patch.

Bot data: {"action":"start","triggered_at":"2024-03-07T19:14:30Z","revision":"ccee00488a0eb5d7e0ef33c22e2f19ea58e98a5a"}


Please don’t reply on this GitHub thread. Visit golang.org/cl/569696.
After addressing review feedback, remember to publish your drafts!

@gopherbot
Copy link
Contributor

Message from Ian Lance Taylor:

Patch Set 3: -Commit-Queue


Please don’t reply on this GitHub thread. Visit golang.org/cl/569696.
After addressing review feedback, remember to publish your drafts!

@gopherbot
Copy link
Contributor

Message from Go LUCI:

Patch Set 3:

This CL has passed the run


Please don’t reply on this GitHub thread. Visit golang.org/cl/569696.
After addressing review feedback, remember to publish your drafts!

@gopherbot
Copy link
Contributor

Message from Go LUCI:

Patch Set 3: LUCI-TryBot-Result+1


Please don’t reply on this GitHub thread. Visit golang.org/cl/569696.
After addressing review feedback, remember to publish your drafts!

gopherbot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 8, 2024
Change-Id: I0e55dd68d92c39aba511b55368bf50d929d75f86
GitHub-Last-Rev: 1743014
GitHub-Pull-Request: #66158
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/569696
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: qiulaidongfeng <[email protected]>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <[email protected]>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <[email protected]>
@gopherbot
Copy link
Contributor

This PR is being closed because golang.org/cl/569696 has been merged.

@gopherbot gopherbot closed this Mar 8, 2024
@apocelipes apocelipes deleted the feat-tar-use-clear branch March 14, 2024 12:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants