Skip to content

Update to kerasHub package #572

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

sachinprasadhs
Copy link
Contributor

Description of the change

Motivation

Keras NLP is migrated to Keras Hub and all the new releases are made in the Keras Hub package name, making the changes here for code to continue it's behavior with the latest Keras Hub package.

Type of change

Choose one: (Bug fix | Documentation )

Checklist

  • [x ] I have performed a self-review of my code.
  • I have added detailed comments to my code where applicable.
  • [x ] I have verified that my change does not break existing code.
  • [x ] My PR is based on the latest changes of the main branch (if unsure, please run git pull --rebase upstream main).
  • [x ] I am familiar with the Google Style Guide for the language I have coded in.
  • [x ] I have read through the Contributing Guide and signed the Contributor License Agreement.

@sachinprasadhs sachinprasadhs requested a review from a team as a code owner April 18, 2025 22:23
Copy link

Check out this pull request on  ReviewNB

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.


Powered by ReviewNB

@github-actions github-actions bot added status:awaiting review PR awaiting review from a maintainer component:documentation Update docs labels Apr 18, 2025
@joefernandez
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks! Tuning guide was updated separately to include these fixes. Closing.

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the status:awaiting review PR awaiting review from a maintainer label May 5, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants