Skip to content

Refactor the LocalSchemaTransport into an AsyncTransport #84

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 16, 2020
Merged

Refactor the LocalSchemaTransport into an AsyncTransport #84

merged 1 commit into from
May 16, 2020

Conversation

leszekhanusz
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.5%) to 99.002% when pulling 629257c on leszekhanusz:feature_async_local_transport into e7c9fa5 on graphql-python:master.

1 similar comment
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.5%) to 99.002% when pulling 629257c on leszekhanusz:feature_async_local_transport into e7c9fa5 on graphql-python:master.

@leszekhanusz leszekhanusz mentioned this pull request May 16, 2020
Closed
@Cito Cito merged commit e024953 into graphql-python:master May 16, 2020
@leszekhanusz leszekhanusz deleted the feature_async_local_transport branch May 17, 2020 05:20
@KingDarBoja KingDarBoja added this to the Version 3.0 milestone Jun 30, 2020
@KingDarBoja KingDarBoja added the type: optimization A code change that improves performance label Jun 30, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
type: optimization A code change that improves performance
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Version 3.0
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@leszekhanusz @coveralls @Cito @KingDarBoja