Skip to content

Add code-action to fill in functions required for implementing a type-class #652

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
fendor opened this issue Dec 7, 2020 · 3 comments · Fixed by #661
Closed

Add code-action to fill in functions required for implementing a type-class #652

fendor opened this issue Dec 7, 2020 · 3 comments · Fixed by #661
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@fendor
Copy link
Collaborator

fendor commented Dec 7, 2020

E.g. on a code-snippet:

data Bar = Bar

instance Show Bar where

The code-action should offer (semantically):

data Bar = Bar

instance Show Bar where
  showsPrec = undefined

and

data Bar = Bar

instance Show Bar where
  show = undefined

This could explode exponentially if there are complex Minimal pragmas, but I guess that is fine.
The stub-definition could be implemented with snippets.

@fendor fendor added the type: enhancement New feature or request label Dec 7, 2020
@fendor
Copy link
Collaborator Author

fendor commented Dec 7, 2020

I don't know how easy/difficult it would be to implement something like that.

@ocharles
Copy link
Contributor

ocharles commented Dec 8, 2020

I'd suggest holes instead of undefined

@Ailrun
Copy link
Member

Ailrun commented Dec 8, 2020

I will try this using a similar idea with the AddPragma plugin (NVM, I took a different pathway)

@Ailrun Ailrun self-assigned this Dec 8, 2020
pepeiborra added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 27, 2020
* Add a test for #726

* Add a test for #652

* Fix missing qualifiers in code actions
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants