Skip to content

Add code actions for disabling a warning in the current file #1235

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Jan 21, 2021
Merged

Add code actions for disabling a warning in the current file #1235

merged 7 commits into from
Jan 21, 2021

Conversation

georgefst
Copy link
Collaborator

@georgefst georgefst commented Jan 19, 2021 •
edited
Loading

Previously known as haskell/ghcide#897.

Progress towards #705.

@georgefst
Slacken some flaky tests
2aa5356 
The properties tested were previously unnecessarily strong and would break witht the addition of irrelevant code actions. We now don't care about position and total quantity of code actions, only that the ones we care about exist.
@georgefst
Add code action for disabling a warning
7362a90
@georgefst georgefst changed the title Disable warning action Add code actions for disabling a warning in the current file Jan 19, 2021
@jneira jneira mentioned this pull request Jan 20, 2021
Closed
7 tasks
@georgefst
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Fairly confident tests should pass now.

Are we squash-merging these days? Commit history here is a bit noisy due to some carelessness on my part...

@Ailrun
Copy link
Member

Ailrun commented Jan 20, 2021 •
edited
Loading

@georgefst Mostly yes. Although some manual merges are done as normal merges, automated ones with "merge me" label are done as squash merges.

@georgefst
Copy link
Collaborator Author

... and we're done. Closes #571.

There are a lot of tests which rely on the exact position in which a particular action happens to appear in the list returned by getCodeActions. This is pretty brittle. I've rewritten the ones that were broken by this change, but we might want to take a look at improving the others.

jneira
jneira approved these changes Jan 21, 2021
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@jneira jneira left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great, this is a nice feature and includes a solid test suite, thanks!

@jneira jneira added the merge me Label to trigger pull request merge label Jan 21, 2021
@jneira jneira linked an issue Jan 21, 2021 that may be closed by this pull request
Suggest adding -Wno-orphans when orphans are encountered #571
Closed
@mergify mergify bot merged commit f03a7fa into haskell:master Jan 21, 2021
@berberman berberman mentioned this pull request Feb 9, 2021
Closed
This was referenced Feb 20, 2021
Closed
Merged
@georgefst georgefst mentioned this pull request Jul 30, 2021
Closed
@georgefst georgefst mentioned this pull request Sep 15, 2022
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@jneira jneira jneira approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
merge me Label to trigger pull request merge
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Suggest adding -Wno-orphans when orphans are encountered
3 participants
@georgefst @Ailrun @jneira