Skip to content

Aurevoir PyTorch 1 #35358

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 20, 2024
Merged

Aurevoir PyTorch 1 #35358

merged 3 commits into from
Dec 20, 2024

Conversation

ydshieh
Copy link
Collaborator

@ydshieh ydshieh commented Dec 20, 2024

What does this PR do?

Bye

@HuggingFaceDocBuilderDev

The docs for this PR live here. All of your documentation changes will be reflected on that endpoint. The docs are available until 30 days after the last update.

@ydshieh ydshieh changed the title Au revoir PyTorch 1 Aurevoir PyTorch 1 Dec 20, 2024
@ydshieh ydshieh requested a review from ArthurZucker December 20, 2024 13:08
Copy link
Collaborator

@ArthurZucker ArthurZucker left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice! 🤗

@ydshieh ydshieh merged commit 05de764 into main Dec 20, 2024
26 checks passed
@ydshieh ydshieh deleted the drop_torch_1 branch December 20, 2024 13:36
@oraluben oraluben mentioned this pull request Jan 2, 2025
5 tasks
@oraluben oraluben mentioned this pull request Jan 2, 2025
5 tasks
oraluben added a commit to oraluben/transformers that referenced this pull request Jan 6, 2025
ydshieh pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 8, 2025
Bump torch requirement, follow-up of #35358
Cyrilvallez pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 18, 2025
* Fix XGLM loss computation (PyTorch and TensorFlow)

* Update expected output string in XGLM sample test

This updates the expected output string of test_xglm_sample for torch
2.0 to the correct one and removes the one for torch 1.13.1 + cu116
(transformers moved to torch 2.0 with PR #35358).

* Update expected output IDs in XGLM generation test
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants