Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Aug 18, 2020. It is now read-only.

make compatible with nixos #3374

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 22, 2018
Merged

make compatible with nixos #3374

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 22, 2018

Conversation

MarcFontaine
Copy link
Contributor

Description

make the script callable on nixos

Linked issue

  • 🐞 Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • 🛠 New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • ⚠️ Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • 🏭 Refactoring that does not change existing functionality but does improve things like code readability, structure etc
  • 🔨 New or improved tests for existing code
  • ⛑ git-flow chore (backport, hotfix, etc)

Developer checklist

  • I have read the style guide document, and my code follows the code style of this project.
  • If my code deals with exceptions, it follows the guidelines.
  • I have updated any documentation accordingly, if needed. Documentation changes can be reflected in opening a PR on cardanodocs.com, amending the inline Haddock comments, any relevant README file or one of the document listed in the docs directory.
  • CHANGELOG entry has been added and is linked to the correct PR on GitHub.

Testing checklist

  • I have added tests to cover my changes.
  • All new and existing tests passed.

QA Steps

Screenshots (if available)

@MarcFontaine MarcFontaine changed the title make compatible for nixos make compatible with nixos Aug 8, 2018
Copy link
Member

@erikd erikd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@MarcFontaine MarcFontaine self-assigned this Aug 9, 2018
@MarcFontaine MarcFontaine merged commit 8602de8 into input-output-hk:develop Aug 22, 2018
@MarcFontaine MarcFontaine deleted the mafo/update-package-dep-graph-nixos branch August 22, 2018 08:50
KtorZ pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 23, 2018
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants