-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 769
[SYCL] Reject zero length arrays #1153
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from 17 commits
eaa10ea
e9dd04a
765d43b
fb3d2ac
9618333
cc9aa9f
8d92c4d
17a2f44
b8a67d3
e28c09e
8634c6e
0a208a1
b515e70
a1c2eb3
11b2e94
7d7a2ec
77a5c88
f63f410
dd87de2
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,104 @@ | ||
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsycl -triple spir64 -fsycl-is-device -verify -fsyntax-only %s | ||
// | ||
// Ensure that the SYCL diagnostics that are typically deferred, correctly emitted. | ||
|
||
// testing that the deferred diagnostics work in conjunction with the SYCL namespaces. | ||
inline namespace cl { | ||
namespace sycl { | ||
class queue { | ||
public: | ||
template <typename T> | ||
void submit(T CGF) {} | ||
}; | ||
|
||
template <int I> | ||
class id {}; | ||
|
||
template <int I> | ||
class range {}; | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I do not see the purpose of defining these classes, it is unnecessary and makes test fat. Can we just use one function with There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. @Fznamznon This PR has been open for over a week now, and is really quite small. This particular test file is defensive. I would prefer that we merge it because we all have other things demanding our attention. I can look into trimming this side test file, if you insist, but my preference is to merge this PR rather than having it languish another week. Let me know. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I understand that you want to capture some problems and we won't forget about them, I appreciate it. But all that I'm asking is reduce the test case to have minimal reproducer for our problems. You want capture that we have problems with namespaces - use namespaces, instead of adding not necessary stuff. All these classes will appear in AST dumps for module and will make debugging harder. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. done. |
||
|
||
class handler { | ||
public: | ||
template <typename KernelName, typename KernelType, int Dims> | ||
__attribute__((sycl_kernel)) void kernel_parallel_for(KernelType kernelFunc) { | ||
// expected-note@+1 2{{called by 'kernel_parallel_for<AName, (lambda}} | ||
kernelFunc(id<1>{}); | ||
} | ||
template <typename KernelName, typename KernelType, int Dims> | ||
void parallel_for(range<Dims> NWI, KernelType kernelFunc) { | ||
kernel_parallel_for<KernelName, KernelType, Dims>(kernelFunc); | ||
} | ||
}; | ||
} // namespace sycl | ||
} // namespace cl | ||
|
||
//variadic functions from SYCL kernels emit a deferred diagnostic | ||
void variadic(int, ...); | ||
|
||
int calledFromKernel(int a) { | ||
// expected-error@+1 {{zero-length arrays are not permitted in C++}} | ||
int MalArray[0]; | ||
|
||
// expected-error@+1 {{__float128 is not supported on this target}} | ||
__float128 malFloat = 40; | ||
|
||
//expected-error@+1 {{SYCL kernel cannot call a variadic function}} | ||
variadic(5); | ||
|
||
return a + 20; | ||
} | ||
|
||
// template used to specialize a function that contains a lambda that should | ||
// result in a deferred diagnostic being emitted. | ||
// HOWEVER, this is not working presently. | ||
// TODO: re-test after new deferred diagnostic system is merged. | ||
// restore the "FIX!!" tests below | ||
|
||
template <typename T> | ||
void setup_sycl_operation(const T VA[]) { | ||
|
||
cl::sycl::range<1> numOfItems; | ||
cl::sycl::queue deviceQueue; | ||
|
||
deviceQueue.submit([&](cl::sycl::handler &cgh) { | ||
cgh.parallel_for<class AName>(numOfItems, [=](cl::sycl::id<1> wiID) { | ||
// FIX!! xpected-error@+1 {{zero-length arrays are not permitted in C++}} | ||
int OverlookedBadArray[0]; | ||
|
||
// FIX!! xpected-error@+1 {{__float128 is not supported on this target}} | ||
__float128 overlookedBadFloat = 40; | ||
}); | ||
}); | ||
} | ||
|
||
int main(int argc, char **argv) { | ||
|
||
// --- direct lambda testing --- | ||
cl::sycl::range<1> numOfItems; | ||
cl::sycl::queue deviceQueue; | ||
|
||
deviceQueue.submit([&](cl::sycl::handler &cgh) { | ||
cgh.parallel_for<class AName>(numOfItems, [=](cl::sycl::id<1> wiID) { | ||
// expected-error@+1 {{zero-length arrays are not permitted in C++}} | ||
int BadArray[0]; | ||
|
||
// expected-error@+1 {{__float128 is not supported on this target}} | ||
__float128 badFloat = 40; // this SHOULD trigger a diagnostic | ||
|
||
//expected-error@+1 {{SYCL kernel cannot call a variadic function}} | ||
variadic(5); | ||
|
||
// expected-note@+1 {{called by 'operator()'}} | ||
calledFromKernel(10); | ||
}); | ||
}); | ||
|
||
// --- lambda in specialized function testing --- | ||
|
||
//array A is only used to feed the template | ||
const int array_size = 4; | ||
int A[array_size] = {1, 2, 3, 4}; | ||
setup_sycl_operation(A); | ||
|
||
return 0; | ||
} |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.