Skip to content

[SYCL] Deprecate single_task() and parallel_for() overloads with properties #16728

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 7, 2025

Conversation

HPS-1
Copy link
Contributor

@HPS-1 HPS-1 commented Jan 22, 2025

As the title says, added deprecation messages for such overloads in the sycl_ext_oneapi_kernel_properties extension, suggesting users to use single_task/parallel_for overloads provided in the sycl_ext_oneapi_enqueue_functions extension instead. (As these overloads are to be removed later as mentioned in #14785) Also fixed an affected test case.

@HPS-1
Copy link
Contributor Author

HPS-1 commented Jan 22, 2025

Note: the deprecation warnings are all added now. There will be a separate PR to fix the failing e2e tests (#16775) before merging this one.

Copy link
Contributor

@Pennycook Pennycook left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think you got them all 👍 .

@HPS-1 HPS-1 marked this pull request as ready for review February 4, 2025 15:36
@HPS-1 HPS-1 requested a review from a team as a code owner February 4, 2025 15:36
@HPS-1 HPS-1 requested a review from steffenlarsen February 4, 2025 15:36
Copy link
Contributor

@steffenlarsen steffenlarsen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@HPS-1
Copy link
Contributor Author

HPS-1 commented Feb 7, 2025

Requesting @intel/llvm-gatekeepers to merge this PR. Thanks!

@AlexeySachkov AlexeySachkov merged commit 41d4f25 into intel:sycl Feb 7, 2025
17 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants