-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.5k
SL.io.50 (Avoid endl
): Mention string streams
#1920
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
hsutter
merged 1 commit into
isocpp:master
from
N-Dekker:SL.io.50-Mention-string-streams
Jun 13, 2022
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -389,6 +389,7 @@ optimizable | |
O'Reilly | ||
org | ||
ostream | ||
ostringstream | ||
overabstract | ||
overconstrain | ||
overconstrained | ||
|
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
or
\n\r
for Mac ;)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@BenjamenMeyer You mean '\r', right? But hasn't Mac moved towards using just a single
\n
, nowadays? Otherwise, are there still actively used C++11 Standard Library implementations for Mac whose file output streams produce a '\r' on each end-of-line?I did notice the smiley in your comment, but I just want to be entirely sure that it's OK not to mention the old Mac '\r' in the proposed text.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@N-Dekker AFAIK mac is still doing the
\n\r
- now, perhaps it changes from application to application, but I've still seen it in recent years. The new text called out the Windows behavior as an example; it could be worth noting (legacy or otherwise) the Mac behavior too.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please don't mention Macs. Your proposed change is fine. What matters is that it doesn't output a platform-specific line ending, you don't need to give multiple examples of things it doesn't do.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm fine with this PR documenting it ;) (e.g not a change - just the commentary here)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@jwakely @BenjamenMeyer Thanks, I won't mention old Macs line endings, if it isn't really necessary. So I also think the PR is OK now.