-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 368
Unit test for java.time #312
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Hi @cyrille-artho, |
@cyrille-artho |
Hi @cyrille-artho, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for the new tests. They are very good overall, and I think they cover the functionality sufficiently. As long as no native code is invoked, the existing library functions can be used without problems.
There is one place where an assertion is repeated (lines 20, 21); please remove the duplicate. Other than that, the tests look good, and we can include them after that change.
Hi @cyrille-artho |
Thanks for your changes. A final question: What do you mean with
If you subtract one timestamp from an identical one, shouldn't the difference always be 0? Unless I'm wrong, the comment can be removed. |
As of new tasks, the most urgent tasks are to ensure that all key features in Java 11 work as they did in Java 8. |
Yeah that's Right I'LL remove that comment |
One test fails now:
You can check the CI build status to get this information, by following the "Details" link next to the red X that marks the failed build. |
Hi@cyrille-artho |
Actually I'm not familiar with CI |
Great, it works now! |
) Co-authored-by: varad64 <[email protected]>
Added the unit test for java.time