-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 453
captcha #2545
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
captcha #2545
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hello @doomedraven, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
Summary of Changes
This pull request introduces reCAPTCHA verification to the CAPE Sandbox web application. It adds a middleware component that checks for reCAPTCHA responses on requests and verifies them. If the verification fails, an error page is rendered. The reCAPTCHA protection can be enabled or disabled via a configuration setting. The middleware is added to the Django middleware stack conditionally based on the configuration.
Highlights
- reCAPTCHA Middleware: Introduces a new middleware component,
RecaptchaVerificationMiddleware
, to handle reCAPTCHA verification for incoming requests. - Configuration Setting: Adds a
captcha_protected_analysis_view
setting inweb.conf.default
to control whether reCAPTCHA protection is enabled. - Conditional Middleware Inclusion: Modifies
settings.py
to conditionally include theRecaptchaVerificationMiddleware
in the Django middleware stack based on thecaptcha_protected_analysis_view
setting.
Changelog
Click here to see the changelog
- conf/default/web.conf.default
- Added
captcha_protected_analysis_view
setting to enable/disable reCAPTCHA protection.
- Added
- web/web/middleware/init.py
- Imported the
RecaptchaVerificationMiddleware
.
- Imported the
- web/web/middleware/recaptcha_views.py
- Created a new middleware class
RecaptchaVerificationMiddleware
to verify reCAPTCHA responses. - The middleware skips
/apiv2/
paths. - If reCAPTCHA verification fails, an error page is rendered.
- Logs reCAPTCHA verification failures with the IP address.
- Created a new middleware class
- web/web/settings.py
- Conditionally added
RecaptchaVerificationMiddleware
to theMIDDLEWARE
list based on thecaptcha_protected_analysis_view
setting.
- Conditionally added
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command>
or @gemini-code-assist <command>
. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
Feature | Command | Description |
---|---|---|
Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/
folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
A bot's advance, a human's plight,
reCAPTCHA stands, a digital knight.
With twisted words and blurry scenes,
It guards the web from coded fiends.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request introduces a reCAPTCHA verification middleware to protect specific views in the CAPE Sandbox web interface. The changes involve adding a configuration option to enable/disable reCAPTCHA protection for the analysis view, implementing the middleware to verify reCAPTCHA responses, and integrating the middleware into the Django settings. Overall, the implementation seems reasonable, but there are a few areas that could be improved.
Summary of Findings
- Configuration option usage: The configuration option
captcha_protected_analysis_view
is added but not fully utilized. The middleware currently skips reCAPTCHA verification for/apiv2/
paths and has commented-out code for applying it to/analysis/
. The configuration option should be used to dynamically enable/disable the reCAPTCHA protection for the analysis view. - Error handling and logging: The error handling in the middleware is basic. It only prints a message to the console when reCAPTCHA verification fails. More robust error handling and logging mechanisms should be implemented, potentially including fail2ban integration as suggested in the TODO comment.
- Security considerations: The middleware currently applies reCAPTCHA to all POST requests. This might not be desirable, as some POST requests might not require reCAPTCHA protection. The middleware should be configured to only apply reCAPTCHA to specific views or requests that require it.
Merge Readiness
The pull request introduces a valuable security feature by adding reCAPTCHA verification. However, the current implementation has some limitations and potential issues that should be addressed before merging. Specifically, the configuration option usage, error handling, and security considerations need to be improved. I am unable to approve this pull request, and recommend that others review and approve this code before merging. At a minimum, the high severity issues should be addressed before merging.
No description provided.