Update master branch to 9.0.0-snapshot client #698
Conversation
k8s-ci-robot
added
the
cncf-cla: yes
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: roycaihw The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
k8s-ci-robot
added
the
approved
k8s-ci-robot
added
the
size/XXL
|
/hold adding CHANGELOG for v6.1.0 and v8.0.1 |
k8s-ci-robot
added
the
do-not-merge/hold
|
/hold cancel CHANGELOG added |
k8s-ci-robot
removed
the
do-not-merge/hold
| @@ -268,18 +268,18 @@ def delete_collection_initializer_configuration_with_http_info(self, **kwargs): | |||
| _request_timeout=params.get('_request_timeout'), | |||
| collection_formats=collection_formats) | |||
|
|
|||
| def delete_initializer_configuration(self, name, body, **kwargs): | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This looks like it’s potentially going to break some codes if they called the function with func(name, body). Now user needs to call with func(name, body=xxx)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks like all delete methods will have this change. Probably want to document this
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It was documented in API change. I added a duplicate of the body param changelog in Breaking Change.
| @@ -83,17 +83,18 @@ supported versions of Kubernetes clusters. | |||
|
|
|||
| #### Compatibility matrix | |||
|
|
|||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Do we indicate that we drop v6 support here or in the actual release?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We support 3 stable releases, so we will drop v6 support after we release v9 GA version.
|
/lgtm |
k8s-ci-robot
added
the
lgtm
This PR updates python-base submodule and generates client for 9.0.0-snapshot.
The next step is to fork a release-9.0 branch from master and re-generate the client with version constant updates.
/assign @yliaog