🌱 Make namespace creation optional and configurable per component

[fariaass]

What this PR does / why we need it:
This PR adds the option to choose whether to create namespaces together the providers or not while helm chart installing. It makes the option configurable per component.

[linux-foundation-easycla]

• ✅login: fariaass / (a986e3e)
• ✅login: fariaass / (a986e3e, 8507f0c)

The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

[k8s-ci-robot]

Welcome @fariaass!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-operator 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-operator has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

[k8s-ci-robot]

Hi @fariaass. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for kubernetes-sigs-cluster-api-operator ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	8507f0c
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/kubernetes-sigs-cluster-api-operator/deploys/68220edc814aed00086d761c
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-813--kubernetes-sigs-cluster-api-operator.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

[dmvolod]

/ok-to-test

[fariaass]

Hey guys! How are you doing?
Do you have any updates about this pls?
Is there anything I am supposed to do?

[furkatgofurov7]

Having a self-contained chart to me looks more favorable where the chart manages everything needed, however, I do understand also the use cases where it should be optional and that is useful, since at the end of the day the default behaviour is staying the same (we always create ns unless it is explicitly set not to do so) after this change, so I am fine with the change.

/lgtm

[k8s-ci-robot]

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: bd1d571b57b8b104da9e5c48beb3affa05e028ee

[alexander-demicev]

/approve

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: alexander-demicev

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [alexander-demicev]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment