-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.4k
🌱 clusterctl: add nutanix ipam & runtime extensions providers #11135
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
k8s-ci-robot
merged 3 commits into
kubernetes-sigs:main
from
jimmidyson:jimmi/add-caren-caipamx
Nov 13, 2024
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
To follow the conventions at https://main.cluster-api.sigs.k8s.io/clusterctl/provider-contract.html#adding-a-provider-to-clusterctl
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We already have an infra provider simply called nutanix at https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api/blob/main/cmd/clusterctl/client/config/providers_client.go#L55 and it would be great if we could use the same name for these other provider types for consistency 🙏
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good point. Maybe it's fine if a GitHub org already "claimed" the name via another provider
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would make sense. Fine for me if we have an agreement :-)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@fabriziopandini @vincepri WDYT?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we can allow this because https://github.com/nutanix is owned by the same org that owns https://github.com/nutanix-cloud-native.
Do you mind updating https://cluster-api.sigs.k8s.io/clusterctl/provider-contract.html#providers-github-org-prefix with something like
In case the entity proposing the new providers owns different github organizations, it is also possible to Provider's GitHub org prefix (in this case it is up to this entity to avoid or address conflicts).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure we need to update any docs. Can't we just agree as we (Nutanix) already claimed the
nutanix
provider name for infra provider as mentioned above?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've added some docs as requested. Please review when you get a chance 🙏