✨clusterctl: fix RBAC rules and make multi-tenancy possible #1986
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
k8s-ci-robot
added
cncf-cla: yes
|
Looking |
vincepri
reviewed
Jan 2, 2020
|
@vincepri comment addressed |
k8s-ci-robot
added
the
lgtm
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: fabriziopandini, vincepri The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
k8s-ci-robot
added
the
approved
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What this PR does / why we need it:
This PR implements a transformation in the RBAC rules read from the components YAML that ensures that also the ClusterRole and the ClusterRoleBindings are duplicated for each instance of a provider.
By having duplicated RBAC each instance of the provider can have separated lifecycles without introducing any backward/forward compatibility rules.
Nb. technically the providers share CRD, but CRD changes are strictly ruled.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes
Fixes: #1631
Rif #1729
@vincepri
@ncdc