Skip to content

✨clusterctl: fix labels #2152

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

fabriziopandini
Copy link
Member

What this PR does / why we need it:
#2070 introduces a new Cluster API label cluster.x-k8s.io/provider

This PR adapt clusterctl to use the above label, and drops the clusterctl.cluster.x-k8s.io/provider label that now is a duplicate of the Cluster API one.

Additionally, a new clusterctl label clusterctl.cluster.x-k8s.io/core is added and applied to the core component installed by clusterctl, the inventory CRDs and the cert-manager, so it will be possible to implement proper lifecycle for those components as well

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
rif #1729

/area clusterctl
/assign @ncdc
/assign @vincepri

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added area/clusterctl Issues or PRs related to clusterctl cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jan 26, 2020
@fabriziopandini
Copy link
Member Author

/hold
waiting for #2070 to merge

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jan 26, 2020
Copy link
Member

@vincepri vincepri left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve
/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 27, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: fabriziopandini, vincepri

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 27, 2020
@ncdc
Copy link
Contributor

ncdc commented Jan 27, 2020

2070 is in. unhold?

@vincepri
Copy link
Member

yep

/hold cancel

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jan 27, 2020

labels := o.GetLabels()
if labels == nil {
labels = map[string]string{}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
labels = map[string]string{}
labels = make(map[string]string)

@@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ for the inventory of the providers currently installed in the management cluster

<h1>Warning</h1>

The `clusterctl.cluster.x-k8s.io` labels and the `Provider` objects MUST NOT altered.
The `clusterctl.cluster.x-k8s.io` labels, the `cluster.x-k8s.io/provider` labels and the `Provider` objects MUST NOT altered.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit:

Suggested change
The `clusterctl.cluster.x-k8s.io` labels, the `cluster.x-k8s.io/provider` labels and the `Provider` objects MUST NOT altered.
The `clusterctl.cluster.x-k8s.io` labels, the `cluster.x-k8s.io/provider` labels and the `Provider` objects MUST NOT be altered.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit bf51a25 into kubernetes-sigs:master Jan 27, 2020
@fabriziopandini fabriziopandini deleted the clusterctl-fix-labels branch January 28, 2020 06:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/clusterctl Issues or PRs related to clusterctl cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants