Skip to content

🐛clusterctl: preflight for move operation #2313

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

fabriziopandini
Copy link
Member

What this PR does / why we need it:
This PR implements a preflight check before the move operation that checks if the required providers are in place in the target cluster.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Rif #1729

/area clusterctl
/assign @wfernandes
/assign @vincepri

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added area/clusterctl Issues or PRs related to clusterctl cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Feb 12, 2020
// If we are moving objects in all the namespaces, skip all the providers with a different watching namespace.
// NB. This introduces a constraints for move all namespaces, that the configuration of source and target provider MUST match (except for the version);
// however this is acceptable because clusterctl supports only two models of multi-tenancy (n-Infra, n-Core).
if namespace == "" && !(targetProvider.WatchedNamespace == sourceProvider.WatchedNamespace) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
if namespace == "" && !(targetProvider.WatchedNamespace == sourceProvider.WatchedNamespace) {
if namespace == "" && targetProvider.WatchedNamespace != sourceProvider.WatchedNamespace {

args: args{
namespace: "", // all namespaces
toProxy: test.NewFakeProxy().
WithProviderInventory("capi", clusterctlv1.CoreProviderType, "v1.0.0", "capi1-system", ""),
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
WithProviderInventory("capi", clusterctlv1.CoreProviderType, "v1.0.0", "capi1-system", ""),
WithProviderInventory("capi", clusterctlv1.CoreProviderType, "v1.0.0", "capi-system", ""),

@wfernandes
Copy link
Contributor

Made some minor suggestions. But other than those.
/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 13, 2020
Copy link
Member

@vincepri vincepri left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: fabriziopandini, vincepri

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 14, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 12b2539 into kubernetes-sigs:master Feb 14, 2020
@fabriziopandini fabriziopandini deleted the clusterctl-move-preflight-providers branch February 17, 2020 15:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/clusterctl Issues or PRs related to clusterctl cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants