Skip to content

✨ add NodeVolumeDetachTimeout support for Cluster Topology #7235

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

ykakarap
Copy link
Contributor

What this PR does / why we need it:

This PR add NodeVolumeDetachTimeout support for Cluster Topology.

NodeVolumeDetachTimeout is introduced in #6413.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes #7233

/hold until #6413 is merged.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Sep 16, 2022
@ykakarap ykakarap force-pushed the cluser-topology_NodeVolumeDetachTimeout branch 2 times, most recently from bbd951c to 1d500d6 Compare September 17, 2022 00:45
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Sep 19, 2022
@furkatgofurov7
Copy link
Member

@ykakarap FYI #6413 is merged now

@ykakarap ykakarap force-pushed the cluser-topology_NodeVolumeDetachTimeout branch from 1d500d6 to 9c71915 Compare September 21, 2022 02:04
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Sep 21, 2022
@ykakarap ykakarap changed the title ✨ [WIP][DO_NOT_REVIEW] NodeVolumeDetachTimeout support for Cluster Topology ✨ add NodeVolumeDetachTimeout support for Cluster Topology Sep 21, 2022
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ykakarap ykakarap left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/hold cancel

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Sep 21, 2022
Copy link
Member

@sbueringer sbueringer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One finding otherwise looks good!

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Sep 21, 2022
@fabriziopandini
Copy link
Member

lgtm pending Stefan comment, great work!

@ykakarap ykakarap force-pushed the cluser-topology_NodeVolumeDetachTimeout branch from f0dfd46 to 61b12f4 Compare September 23, 2022 00:58
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member

Thx!

lgtm pending squash

@ykakarap ykakarap force-pushed the cluser-topology_NodeVolumeDetachTimeout branch from 61b12f4 to 1280aca Compare September 23, 2022 18:33
@ykakarap
Copy link
Contributor Author

Squashed.

Copy link
Member

@fabriziopandini fabriziopandini left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 25, 2022
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member

Thx!

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: sbueringer

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

NodeVolumeDetachTimeout should be made available in Cluster.Spec.Topology
5 participants