Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cleanup logging in the request scheduling path #583

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 27, 2025

Conversation

ahg-g
Copy link
Contributor

@ahg-g ahg-g commented Mar 26, 2025

No description provided.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Mar 26, 2025
Copy link

netlify bot commented Mar 26, 2025

Deploy Preview for gateway-api-inference-extension ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 5384215
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/gateway-api-inference-extension/deploys/67e49d4aca2a7e00086a04db
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-583--gateway-api-inference-extension.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@@ -103,21 +103,21 @@ func (s *StreamingServer) Process(srv extProcPb.ExternalProcessor_ProcessServer)
if recvErr != nil {
// This error occurs very frequently, though it doesn't seem to have any impact.
// TODO Figure out if we can remove this noise.
loggerVerbose.Error(err, "Cannot receive stream request")
logger.V(logutil.DEFAULT).Error(err, "Cannot receive stream request")
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Are we bumping this up to be a tad more noisy so we drive towards resolution?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

that is what I am thinking, is this error expected to happen frequently? what triggers it?

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, I think I support that.

I think @liu-cong originally made that comment. I remember sifting through the libraries we are calling and I ended up in the grpc codebase with inconclusive answers.

Either way we should get some visibility into this to resolve +1

@kfswain
Copy link
Collaborator

kfswain commented Mar 27, 2025

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 27, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ahg-g, kfswain

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 8326110 into kubernetes-sigs:main Mar 27, 2025
7 of 8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants