-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 158
Tests for idempotency #568
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta. |
/remove-lifecycle stale |
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta. |
/lifecycle frozen
…On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 9:52 AM fejta-bot ***@***.***> wrote:
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually
close.
If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.
Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta
<https://github.com/fejta>.
/lifecycle stale
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#568 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AIJCBAEY5B3L3D52FG35VMTS5A3WBANCNFSM4PVX6DXQ>
.
|
We've fixed some issues regarding idempotent calls, such as #563 and #527.
It would be good to test this in general so we can catch other issues. Some suggestions:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: