Skip to content

Add support for HdHA disk provisioning #1915

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 10, 2025

Conversation

tonyzhc
Copy link
Contributor

@tonyzhc tonyzhc commented Jan 29, 2025

What type of PR is this?

/kind feature

What this PR does / why we need it:

This PR adds support for the PDCSI driver to provision Hyperdisk-balanced High Availability (HdHA) disks. This allows users to use the latest generation of regional disks from GCE. The feature is gated behind flag allow-hdha-provisioning.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes b/391964605

Special notes for your reviewer:

One potential gap I observe is that we have to return the raw GCE error if users call ControllerPublishVolume on a HdHA disk in read only mode, because we cannot determine the disk type without actually fetching the disk. I think this is mostly fine since the GCE error is pretty clear (" Error 400: The disk cannot be attached with READ_ONLY mode."), but please let me know if I should add some more explicit error message.

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

Add support for provisioning Hyperdisk-balanced High Availability disks.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Jan 29, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @tonyzhc. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jan 29, 2025
@leiyiz
Copy link
Contributor

leiyiz commented Feb 3, 2025

/ok-to-test
/kind feature

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Feb 3, 2025
@leiyiz leiyiz requested review from amacaskill and removed request for leiyiz and saikat-royc February 3, 2025 19:03
@tonyzhc
Copy link
Contributor Author

tonyzhc commented Feb 3, 2025

/retest

1 similar comment
@tonyzhc
Copy link
Contributor Author

tonyzhc commented Feb 4, 2025

/retest

@amacaskill
Copy link
Member

@tonyzhc
Copy link
Contributor Author

tonyzhc commented Feb 6, 2025

Can confirm that the integration test is failing because of the race condition between createSnapshot and attach/detachDisk (b/345837974): https://screenshot.googleplex.com/BeTmv9fojEWedUF.

@tonyzhc
Copy link
Contributor Author

tonyzhc commented Feb 6, 2025

/retest

@amacaskill
Copy link
Member

Please fix the latest comments I left here and over chat, then I will take one last look. I think its pretty close at this point!

@amacaskill
Copy link
Member

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 8, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: amacaskill, tonyzhc

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 8, 2025
@@ -16,4 +16,4 @@ if hostname | grep -q c.googlers.com ; then
CLOUDTOP_HOST=--cloudtop-host
fi

ginkgo --v "test/e2e/tests" -- --project "${PROJECT}" --service-account "${IAM_NAME}" "${CLOUDTOP_HOST}" --v=6 --logtostderr $@
ginkgo --focus "HdHA" --v "test/e2e/tests" -- --project "${PROJECT}" --service-account "${IAM_NAME}" "${CLOUDTOP_HOST}" --v=6 --logtostderr $@
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we can revert this change

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Removed.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 10, 2025
@amacaskill
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 10, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 10, 2025
@amacaskill
Copy link
Member

/retest

@amacaskill
Copy link
Member

/test pull-gcp-compute-persistent-disk-csi-driver-e2e

@amacaskill
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 10, 2025
@tonyzhc
Copy link
Contributor Author

tonyzhc commented Feb 10, 2025

/retest

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@tonyzhc: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
pull-gcp-compute-persistent-disk-csi-driver-kubernetes-integration 6ecdd9b link true /test pull-gcp-compute-persistent-disk-csi-driver-kubernetes-integration
pull-gcp-compute-persistent-disk-csi-driver-e2e 6ecdd9b link true /test pull-gcp-compute-persistent-disk-csi-driver-e2e

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants