Skip to content

validate emails .... #8377

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 17, 2025
Merged

validate emails .... #8377

merged 3 commits into from
Mar 17, 2025

Conversation

BenTheElder
Copy link
Member

And add a TODO about awkward data format with de-normalized person entries.

TODO: once I've confirmed that CI fails with the first commit, fix inconsistent entries in a second commit.

Refer to kubernetes/steering#281

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. sig/contributor-experience Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Contributor Experience. labels Mar 11, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested review from aojea and soltysh March 11, 2025 22:44
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Mar 11, 2025
@BenTheElder
Copy link
Member Author

BenTheElder commented Mar 11, 2025

Ok good, this now fails on the currently mismatched and/or missing emails: https://prow.k8s.io/view/gs/kubernetes-ci-logs/pr-logs/pull/community/8377/pull-community-verify/1899592384602181632

these leads had emails set but not the same across all positions, reconciled them

(Note TODO about data format ...)
confirmed with them in slack
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Mar 11, 2025
@@ -3995,7 +4008,7 @@ committees:
- github: aojea
name: Antonio Ojea
company: Google
email: antonio.ojea.garcia@gmail.com
email: aojea@google.com
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@aojea this was the one set the most for you, and the oldest one, but we can update it to either (just need it to be the same for all so we don't duplicate to CNCF)

The rest of these were only "inconsistent" for having empty values.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm fine with any

@@ -3382,6 +3387,7 @@ sigs:
- github: marosset
name: Mark Rossetti
company: Microsoft
email: [email protected]
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

confirmed with @marosset in slack

aside from marosset and aojea, all others are just filling in empty fields to match existing entries for other groups

ideally we would dedupe the person entries entirely, but that's a larger PR, and they're usually duplicated at most a few times ...

@BenTheElder
Copy link
Member Author

/hold
for discussion / review

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Mar 11, 2025
@aojea
Copy link
Member

aojea commented Mar 11, 2025

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 11, 2025
@marosset
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm for me

@BenTheElder
Copy link
Member Author

we might need to update

approvers:
- cblecker
- nikhita
- spiffxp

cc @cblecker @nikhita

@BenTheElder
Copy link
Member Author

cc @kubernetes/sig-contributor-experience-leads

Copy link
Contributor

@soltysh soltysh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: BenTheElder, soltysh

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [BenTheElder,soltysh]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@BenTheElder
Copy link
Member Author

/hold-cancel

@Priyankasaggu11929
Copy link
Member

LGTM – changes for enforcing setting email

Also, re: #8377 (comment)

I'll discuss it among contribex leads and will follow up with a PR (most likely, will add contrbex leads alias to start with)

@soltysh
Copy link
Contributor

soltysh commented Mar 17, 2025

/hold cancel

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Mar 17, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 19094aa into kubernetes:master Mar 17, 2025
3 checks passed
@BenTheElder BenTheElder deleted the same-email branch March 17, 2025 20:34
// non-emeritus must have email and company set
if prefix != "emeritus_lead" {
// email must be set and consistent
if val.Email == "" {
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. sig/contributor-experience Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Contributor Experience. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants