Skip to content

Follow up to PR 248 for automation of google groups #255

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
5 tasks
dims opened this issue May 9, 2019 · 11 comments
Closed
5 tasks

Follow up to PR 248 for automation of google groups #255

dims opened this issue May 9, 2019 · 11 comments
Labels
area/access Define who has access to what via IAM bindings, role bindings, policy, etc. priority/backlog Higher priority than priority/awaiting-more-evidence.

Comments

@dims
Copy link
Member

dims commented May 9, 2019

  • Extract k8s-infra- prefix requested by @spiffxp
  • Search for a way to constrain this to groups created solely by this service account instead of or in addition to blacklisting by name requested by @spiffxp
  • Pick Authoritative model vs Opportunistic model requested by @cblecker
  • Make lists settings for security customizable
  • Ability to specify "owner"/"manager"/"member" for a google group
@dims
Copy link
Member Author

dims commented May 9, 2019

/assign @dims

@dims
Copy link
Member Author

dims commented May 9, 2019

cc @spiffxp @thockin @cblecker

@spiffxp
Copy link
Member

spiffxp commented May 9, 2019

ref: #228

@spiffxp spiffxp added this to the migrate-low-risk milestone May 9, 2019
@spiffxp
Copy link
Member

spiffxp commented Jun 12, 2019

/area access

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the area/access Define who has access to what via IAM bindings, role bindings, policy, etc. label Jun 12, 2019
@dims
Copy link
Member Author

dims commented Jul 8, 2019

/unassign

@thockin
Copy link
Member

thockin commented Jul 8, 2019

This is now totally unassigned. Is it important? Can we throw a prio tag on it?

@dims
Copy link
Member Author

dims commented Jul 8, 2019

/priority backlog

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the priority/backlog Higher priority than priority/awaiting-more-evidence. label Jul 8, 2019
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Oct 6, 2019
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Nov 5, 2019
@cblecker
Copy link
Member

cblecker commented Nov 5, 2019

/remove-lifecycle rotten
/close

Everything in here is done already.

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@cblecker: Closing this issue.

In response to this:

/remove-lifecycle rotten
/close

Everything in here is done already.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. label Nov 5, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/access Define who has access to what via IAM bindings, role bindings, policy, etc. priority/backlog Higher priority than priority/awaiting-more-evidence.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants