-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 40.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Restore honoring --version build ID overrides #126665
Conversation
/retest |
aa16ff6
to
01a26a0
Compare
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: liggitt The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
test passed |
/hold cancel This will need revisiting if we actually start letting people override the binary version (I'm not sure if that's planned or not), but this is a minimal version to resolve the regression for 1.31 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: e372f454319f7f7ccad42f5a3d7fb1c8ca07d734
|
01a26a0
to
9eed330
Compare
9eed330
to
c181912
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
[discussed shellcheck fix, see diff link above in "compare" button]
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: a6fceb3bd5e09b67f0333bef9b022f6ab48ed61d
|
/priority important-soon |
…665-upstream-release-1.31 Automated cherry pick of #126665: Restore honoring --version build ID overrides
What type of PR is this?
/kind bug
/kind regression
What this PR does / why we need it:
Minimal fix to restore honoring
--version
build ID overrides for 1.31Added a simple test around the behavior at the start of test-cmd, where we're starting a real built API server
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #126663
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?
/sig api-machinery
/assign @jpbetz
/hold for tests