-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.5k
[lldb-dap] Support StackFrameFormat #137113
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from 1 commit
2168161
5b1378f
3cf5b4f
66f2253
0584669
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
@@ -49,14 +49,15 @@ static constexpr int StackPageSize = 20; | |||||
// | ||||||
// s=3,l=3 = [th0->s3, label1, th1->s0] | ||||||
static bool FillStackFrames(DAP &dap, lldb::SBThread &thread, | ||||||
lldb::SBFormat &frame_format, | ||||||
llvm::json::Array &stack_frames, int64_t &offset, | ||||||
const int64_t start_frame, const int64_t levels) { | ||||||
bool reached_end_of_stack = false; | ||||||
for (int64_t i = start_frame; | ||||||
static_cast<int64_t>(stack_frames.size()) < levels; i++) { | ||||||
if (i == -1) { | ||||||
stack_frames.emplace_back( | ||||||
CreateExtendedStackFrameLabel(thread, dap.frame_format)); | ||||||
CreateExtendedStackFrameLabel(thread, frame_format)); | ||||||
continue; | ||||||
} | ||||||
|
||||||
|
@@ -67,7 +68,7 @@ static bool FillStackFrames(DAP &dap, lldb::SBThread &thread, | |||||
break; | ||||||
} | ||||||
|
||||||
stack_frames.emplace_back(CreateStackFrame(frame, dap.frame_format)); | ||||||
stack_frames.emplace_back(CreateStackFrame(frame, frame_format)); | ||||||
} | ||||||
|
||||||
if (dap.configuration.displayExtendedBacktrace && reached_end_of_stack) { | ||||||
|
@@ -80,7 +81,7 @@ static bool FillStackFrames(DAP &dap, lldb::SBThread &thread, | |||||
continue; | ||||||
|
||||||
reached_end_of_stack = FillStackFrames( | ||||||
dap, backtrace, stack_frames, offset, | ||||||
dap, backtrace, frame_format, stack_frames, offset, | ||||||
(start_frame - offset) > 0 ? start_frame - offset : -1, levels); | ||||||
if (static_cast<int64_t>(stack_frames.size()) >= levels) | ||||||
break; | ||||||
|
@@ -178,14 +179,45 @@ void StackTraceRequestHandler::operator()( | |||||
llvm::json::Array stack_frames; | ||||||
llvm::json::Object body; | ||||||
|
||||||
lldb::SBFormat frame_format = dap.frame_format; | ||||||
|
||||||
if (const auto *format = arguments->getObject("format")) { | ||||||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Another thing I notice is the I'm not sure what that would mean in terms of a stack frame however, just thought I would note that for completeness. |
||||||
const bool parameters = GetBoolean(format, "parameters").value_or(false); | ||||||
const bool parameter_names = | ||||||
GetBoolean(format, "parameterNames").value_or(false); | ||||||
const bool parameter_values = | ||||||
GetBoolean(format, "parameterValues").value_or(false); | ||||||
const bool line = GetBoolean(format, "line").value_or(false); | ||||||
const bool module = GetBoolean(format, "module").value_or(false); | ||||||
const bool include_all = GetBoolean(format, "includeAll").value_or(false); | ||||||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I think this is maybe a different meaning than the spec meant for It says:
Which to me, sounds like its about hiding frames that we might not find interesting (e.g. frames from system libraries). I think if this is There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Great observation, you're right. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Its worth noting that today I don't think we skip any frames, however we do use the 'presentationHint' to tweak the frames a little.
|
||||||
|
||||||
std::string format_str; | ||||||
llvm::raw_string_ostream os(format_str); | ||||||
|
||||||
if (include_all || module) | ||||||
os << "{${module.file.basename} }"; | ||||||
|
||||||
if (include_all || line) | ||||||
os << "{${line.file.basename}:${line.number}:${line.column} }"; | ||||||
|
||||||
if (include_all || parameters || parameter_names || parameter_values) | ||||||
os << "{${function.name-with-args}}"; | ||||||
else | ||||||
os << "{${function.name-without-args}}"; | ||||||
|
||||||
lldb::SBError error; | ||||||
frame_format = lldb::SBFormat(format_str.c_str(), error); | ||||||
assert(error.Success()); | ||||||
} | ||||||
|
||||||
if (thread.IsValid()) { | ||||||
const auto start_frame = | ||||||
GetInteger<uint64_t>(arguments, "startFrame").value_or(0); | ||||||
const auto levels = GetInteger<uint64_t>(arguments, "levels").value_or(0); | ||||||
int64_t offset = 0; | ||||||
bool reached_end_of_stack = | ||||||
FillStackFrames(dap, thread, stack_frames, offset, start_frame, | ||||||
levels == 0 ? INT64_MAX : levels); | ||||||
FillStackFrames(dap, thread, frame_format, stack_frames, offset, | ||||||
start_frame, levels == 0 ? INT64_MAX : levels); | ||||||
body.try_emplace("totalFrames", | ||||||
start_frame + stack_frames.size() + | ||||||
(reached_end_of_stack ? 0 : StackPageSize)); | ||||||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
But I could not see why this test is skipped on windows
there is a
#include <unistd.h>
but it is not used any whereThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fair enough. All the tests in this file are skipped on Windows for as far as the history goes back. I can try removing all of them in a followup and see what the Windows bot say.