Skip to content

doc: get rid of redundant TODO tag in FuzzedDataProvider.h #137395

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 25, 2025

Conversation

kevkevinpal
Copy link
Contributor

'list.size()' is determined at runtime, so using static_assert on it as suggested by the TODO comment is not feasible and produces the following error when done:

error: static assertion expression is not an integral constant expression

initially referenced in bitcoin/bitcoin#32024

'list.size()' is determined at runtime, so using static_assert
on it as suggested by the TODO comment is not feasible and
produces the following error when done:

error: static assertion expression is not an integral constant expression

Co-authored-by: Chand-ra <[email protected]>
Copy link

Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project!

This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be notified.

If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this page.

If this is not working for you, it is probably because you do not have write permissions for the repository. In which case you can instead tag reviewers by name in a comment by using @ followed by their GitHub username.

If you have received no comments on your PR for a week, you can request a review by "ping"ing the PR by adding a comment “Ping”. The common courtesy "ping" rate is once a week. Please remember that you are asking for valuable time from other developers.

If you have further questions, they may be answered by the LLVM GitHub User Guide.

You can also ask questions in a comment on this PR, on the LLVM Discord or on the forums.

@llvmbot
Copy link
Member

llvmbot commented Apr 25, 2025

@llvm/pr-subscribers-compiler-rt-sanitizer

Author: kevkevin (kevkevinpal)

Changes

'list.size()' is determined at runtime, so using static_assert on it as suggested by the TODO comment is not feasible and produces the following error when done:

error: static assertion expression is not an integral constant expression

initially referenced in bitcoin/bitcoin#32024


Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137395.diff

1 Files Affected:

  • (modified) compiler-rt/include/fuzzer/FuzzedDataProvider.h (-1)
diff --git a/compiler-rt/include/fuzzer/FuzzedDataProvider.h b/compiler-rt/include/fuzzer/FuzzedDataProvider.h
index 11f2fbdb8c854..33ffa8bc00bfa 100644
--- a/compiler-rt/include/fuzzer/FuzzedDataProvider.h
+++ b/compiler-rt/include/fuzzer/FuzzedDataProvider.h
@@ -314,7 +314,6 @@ T FuzzedDataProvider::PickValueInArray(const std::array<T, size> &array) {
 
 template <typename T>
 T FuzzedDataProvider::PickValueInArray(std::initializer_list<const T> list) {
-  // TODO(Dor1s): switch to static_assert once C++14 is allowed.
   if (!list.size())
     abort();
 

@kevkevinpal kevkevinpal changed the title test: get rid of redundant TODO tag in fuzz tests doc: get rid of redundant TODO tag in FuzzedDataProvider.h Apr 25, 2025
@vitalybuka vitalybuka merged commit 8cd628f into llvm:main Apr 25, 2025
10 of 13 checks passed
Copy link

@kevkevinpal Congratulations on having your first Pull Request (PR) merged into the LLVM Project!

Your changes will be combined with recent changes from other authors, then tested by our build bots. If there is a problem with a build, you may receive a report in an email or a comment on this PR.

Please check whether problems have been caused by your change specifically, as the builds can include changes from many authors. It is not uncommon for your change to be included in a build that fails due to someone else's changes, or infrastructure issues.

How to do this, and the rest of the post-merge process, is covered in detail here.

If your change does cause a problem, it may be reverted, or you can revert it yourself. This is a normal part of LLVM development. You can fix your changes and open a new PR to merge them again.

If you don't get any reports, no action is required from you. Your changes are working as expected, well done!

jyli0116 pushed a commit to jyli0116/llvm-project that referenced this pull request Apr 28, 2025
'list.size()' is determined at runtime, so using static_assert on it as
suggested by the TODO comment is not feasible and produces the following
error when done:

error: static assertion expression is not an integral constant
expression

initially referenced in bitcoin/bitcoin#32024

Co-authored-by: Chand-ra <[email protected]>
IanWood1 pushed a commit to IanWood1/llvm-project that referenced this pull request May 6, 2025
'list.size()' is determined at runtime, so using static_assert on it as
suggested by the TODO comment is not feasible and produces the following
error when done:

error: static assertion expression is not an integral constant
expression

initially referenced in bitcoin/bitcoin#32024

Co-authored-by: Chand-ra <[email protected]>
IanWood1 pushed a commit to IanWood1/llvm-project that referenced this pull request May 6, 2025
'list.size()' is determined at runtime, so using static_assert on it as
suggested by the TODO comment is not feasible and produces the following
error when done:

error: static assertion expression is not an integral constant
expression

initially referenced in bitcoin/bitcoin#32024

Co-authored-by: Chand-ra <[email protected]>
IanWood1 pushed a commit to IanWood1/llvm-project that referenced this pull request May 6, 2025
'list.size()' is determined at runtime, so using static_assert on it as
suggested by the TODO comment is not feasible and produces the following
error when done:

error: static assertion expression is not an integral constant
expression

initially referenced in bitcoin/bitcoin#32024

Co-authored-by: Chand-ra <[email protected]>
Ankur-0429 pushed a commit to Ankur-0429/llvm-project that referenced this pull request May 9, 2025
'list.size()' is determined at runtime, so using static_assert on it as
suggested by the TODO comment is not feasible and produces the following
error when done:

error: static assertion expression is not an integral constant
expression

initially referenced in bitcoin/bitcoin#32024

Co-authored-by: Chand-ra <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants