-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.6k
[coro][pgo] Do not insert counters in the suspend
block
#71262
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
184936c
[coro][pgp] Do not insert counters in the `suspend` block
mtrofin d77e267
Factored suspend case out.
mtrofin 6b85e45
Copied over `coro-split-musstail` tests to InstrProfiling
mtrofin 713bbb7
No need to weigh the problematic edge if it's removed.
mtrofin 18773ca
Merge branch 'main' into coro
mtrofin File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
63 changes: 63 additions & 0 deletions
63
llvm/test/Instrumentation/InstrProfiling/Coro/coro-split-musttail.ll
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@ | ||
; Tests that instrumentation doesn't interfere with lowering (coro-split). | ||
; It should convert coro.resume followed by a suspend to a musttail call. | ||
|
||
; RUN: opt < %s -passes='pgo-instr-gen,cgscc(coro-split),simplifycfg,early-cse' -S | FileCheck %s | ||
|
||
define void @f() #0 { | ||
entry: | ||
%id = call token @llvm.coro.id(i32 0, ptr null, ptr null, ptr null) | ||
%alloc = call ptr @malloc(i64 16) #3 | ||
%vFrame = call noalias nonnull ptr @llvm.coro.begin(token %id, ptr %alloc) | ||
|
||
%save = call token @llvm.coro.save(ptr null) | ||
%addr1 = call ptr @llvm.coro.subfn.addr(ptr null, i8 0) | ||
call fastcc void %addr1(ptr null) | ||
|
||
%suspend = call i8 @llvm.coro.suspend(token %save, i1 false) | ||
switch i8 %suspend, label %exit [ | ||
i8 0, label %await.ready | ||
i8 1, label %exit | ||
] | ||
await.ready: | ||
%save2 = call token @llvm.coro.save(ptr null) | ||
%addr2 = call ptr @llvm.coro.subfn.addr(ptr null, i8 0) | ||
call fastcc void %addr2(ptr null) | ||
|
||
%suspend2 = call i8 @llvm.coro.suspend(token %save2, i1 false) | ||
switch i8 %suspend2, label %exit [ | ||
i8 0, label %exit | ||
i8 1, label %exit | ||
] | ||
exit: | ||
call i1 @llvm.coro.end(ptr null, i1 false, token none) | ||
ret void | ||
} | ||
|
||
; Verify that in the initial function resume is not marked with musttail. | ||
; CHECK-LABEL: @f( | ||
; CHECK: %[[addr1:.+]] = call ptr @llvm.coro.subfn.addr(ptr null, i8 0) | ||
; CHECK-NOT: musttail call fastcc void %[[addr1]](ptr null) | ||
|
||
; Verify that in the resume part resume call is marked with musttail. | ||
; CHECK-LABEL: @f.resume( | ||
; CHECK: %[[addr2:.+]] = call ptr @llvm.coro.subfn.addr(ptr null, i8 0) | ||
; CHECK: call void @llvm.instrprof | ||
; CHECK-NEXT: musttail call fastcc void %[[addr2]](ptr null) | ||
; CHECK-NEXT: ret void | ||
|
||
declare token @llvm.coro.id(i32, ptr readnone, ptr nocapture readonly, ptr) #1 | ||
declare i1 @llvm.coro.alloc(token) #2 | ||
declare i64 @llvm.coro.size.i64() #3 | ||
declare ptr @llvm.coro.begin(token, ptr writeonly) #2 | ||
declare token @llvm.coro.save(ptr) #2 | ||
declare ptr @llvm.coro.frame() #3 | ||
declare i8 @llvm.coro.suspend(token, i1) #2 | ||
declare ptr @llvm.coro.free(token, ptr nocapture readonly) #1 | ||
declare i1 @llvm.coro.end(ptr, i1, token) #2 | ||
declare ptr @llvm.coro.subfn.addr(ptr nocapture readonly, i8) #1 | ||
declare ptr @malloc(i64) | ||
|
||
attributes #0 = { presplitcoroutine } | ||
attributes #1 = { argmemonly nounwind readonly } | ||
attributes #2 = { nounwind } | ||
attributes #3 = { nounwind readnone } |
97 changes: 97 additions & 0 deletions
97
llvm/test/Instrumentation/InstrProfiling/Coro/coro-split-musttail1.ll
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,97 @@ | ||
; Tests that instrumentation doesn't interfere with lowering (coro-split). | ||
; It should convert coro.resume followed by a suspend to a musttail call. | ||
|
||
; RUN: opt < %s -passes='pgo-instr-gen,cgscc(coro-split),simplifycfg,early-cse' -S | FileCheck %s | ||
|
||
define void @f() #0 { | ||
entry: | ||
%id = call token @llvm.coro.id(i32 0, ptr null, ptr null, ptr null) | ||
%alloc = call ptr @malloc(i64 16) #3 | ||
%vFrame = call noalias nonnull ptr @llvm.coro.begin(token %id, ptr %alloc) | ||
|
||
%save = call token @llvm.coro.save(ptr null) | ||
%addr1 = call ptr @llvm.coro.subfn.addr(ptr null, i8 0) | ||
call fastcc void %addr1(ptr null) | ||
|
||
%suspend = call i8 @llvm.coro.suspend(token %save, i1 false) | ||
switch i8 %suspend, label %exit [ | ||
i8 0, label %await.suspend | ||
i8 1, label %exit | ||
] | ||
await.suspend: | ||
%save2 = call token @llvm.coro.save(ptr null) | ||
%br0 = call i8 @switch_result() | ||
switch i8 %br0, label %unreach [ | ||
i8 0, label %await.resume3 | ||
i8 1, label %await.resume1 | ||
i8 2, label %await.resume2 | ||
] | ||
await.resume1: | ||
%hdl = call ptr @g() | ||
%addr2 = call ptr @llvm.coro.subfn.addr(ptr %hdl, i8 0) | ||
call fastcc void %addr2(ptr %hdl) | ||
br label %final.suspend | ||
await.resume2: | ||
%hdl2 = call ptr @h() | ||
%addr3 = call ptr @llvm.coro.subfn.addr(ptr %hdl2, i8 0) | ||
call fastcc void %addr3(ptr %hdl2) | ||
br label %final.suspend | ||
await.resume3: | ||
%addr4 = call ptr @llvm.coro.subfn.addr(ptr null, i8 0) | ||
call fastcc void %addr4(ptr null) | ||
br label %final.suspend | ||
final.suspend: | ||
%suspend2 = call i8 @llvm.coro.suspend(token %save2, i1 false) | ||
switch i8 %suspend2, label %exit [ | ||
i8 0, label %pre.exit | ||
i8 1, label %exit | ||
] | ||
pre.exit: | ||
br label %exit | ||
exit: | ||
call i1 @llvm.coro.end(ptr null, i1 false, token none) | ||
ret void | ||
unreach: | ||
unreachable | ||
} | ||
|
||
; Verify that in the initial function resume is not marked with musttail. | ||
; CHECK-LABEL: @f( | ||
; CHECK: %[[addr1:.+]] = call ptr @llvm.coro.subfn.addr(ptr null, i8 0) | ||
; CHECK-NOT: musttail call fastcc void %[[addr1]](ptr null) | ||
|
||
; Verify that in the resume part resume call is marked with musttail. | ||
; CHECK-LABEL: @f.resume( | ||
; CHECK: %[[hdl:.+]] = call ptr @g() | ||
; CHECK-NEXT: %[[addr2:.+]] = call ptr @llvm.coro.subfn.addr(ptr %[[hdl]], i8 0) | ||
; CHECK: musttail call fastcc void %[[addr2]](ptr %[[hdl]]) | ||
; CHECK-NEXT: ret void | ||
; CHECK: %[[hdl2:.+]] = call ptr @h() | ||
; CHECK-NEXT: %[[addr3:.+]] = call ptr @llvm.coro.subfn.addr(ptr %[[hdl2]], i8 0) | ||
; CHECK: musttail call fastcc void %[[addr3]](ptr %[[hdl2]]) | ||
; CHECK-NEXT: ret void | ||
; CHECK: %[[addr4:.+]] = call ptr @llvm.coro.subfn.addr(ptr null, i8 0) | ||
; CHECK: musttail call fastcc void %[[addr4]](ptr null) | ||
; CHECK-NEXT: ret void | ||
|
||
|
||
|
||
declare token @llvm.coro.id(i32, ptr readnone, ptr nocapture readonly, ptr) #1 | ||
declare i1 @llvm.coro.alloc(token) #2 | ||
declare i64 @llvm.coro.size.i64() #3 | ||
declare ptr @llvm.coro.begin(token, ptr writeonly) #2 | ||
declare token @llvm.coro.save(ptr) #2 | ||
declare ptr @llvm.coro.frame() #3 | ||
declare i8 @llvm.coro.suspend(token, i1) #2 | ||
declare ptr @llvm.coro.free(token, ptr nocapture readonly) #1 | ||
declare i1 @llvm.coro.end(ptr, i1, token) #2 | ||
declare ptr @llvm.coro.subfn.addr(ptr nocapture readonly, i8) #1 | ||
declare ptr @malloc(i64) | ||
declare i8 @switch_result() | ||
declare ptr @g() | ||
declare ptr @h() | ||
|
||
attributes #0 = { presplitcoroutine } | ||
attributes #1 = { argmemonly nounwind readonly } | ||
attributes #2 = { nounwind } | ||
attributes #3 = { nounwind readnone } |
55 changes: 55 additions & 0 deletions
55
llvm/test/Instrumentation/InstrProfiling/Coro/coro-split-musttail10.ll
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@ | ||
; Tests that instrumentation doesn't interfere with lowering (coro-split). | ||
; It should convert coro.resume followed by a suspend to a musttail call. | ||
|
||
; RUN: opt < %s -passes='pgo-instr-gen,cgscc(coro-split),simplifycfg,early-cse' -S | FileCheck %s | ||
|
||
target triple = "wasm64-unknown-unknown" | ||
|
||
define void @f() #0 { | ||
entry: | ||
%id = call token @llvm.coro.id(i32 0, ptr null, ptr null, ptr null) | ||
%alloc = call ptr @malloc(i64 16) #3 | ||
%vFrame = call noalias nonnull ptr @llvm.coro.begin(token %id, ptr %alloc) | ||
|
||
%save = call token @llvm.coro.save(ptr null) | ||
%addr1 = call ptr @llvm.coro.subfn.addr(ptr null, i8 0) | ||
call fastcc void %addr1(ptr null) | ||
|
||
%suspend = call i8 @llvm.coro.suspend(token %save, i1 false) | ||
switch i8 %suspend, label %exit [ | ||
i8 0, label %await.ready | ||
i8 1, label %exit | ||
] | ||
await.ready: | ||
%save2 = call token @llvm.coro.save(ptr null) | ||
%addr2 = call ptr @llvm.coro.subfn.addr(ptr null, i8 0) | ||
call fastcc void %addr2(ptr null) | ||
|
||
%suspend2 = call i8 @llvm.coro.suspend(token %save2, i1 false) | ||
switch i8 %suspend2, label %exit [ | ||
i8 0, label %exit | ||
i8 1, label %exit | ||
] | ||
exit: | ||
call i1 @llvm.coro.end(ptr null, i1 false, token none) | ||
ret void | ||
} | ||
|
||
; CHECK: musttail call | ||
|
||
declare token @llvm.coro.id(i32, ptr readnone, ptr nocapture readonly, ptr) #1 | ||
declare i1 @llvm.coro.alloc(token) #2 | ||
declare i64 @llvm.coro.size.i64() #3 | ||
declare ptr @llvm.coro.begin(token, ptr writeonly) #2 | ||
declare token @llvm.coro.save(ptr) #2 | ||
declare ptr @llvm.coro.frame() #3 | ||
declare i8 @llvm.coro.suspend(token, i1) #2 | ||
declare ptr @llvm.coro.free(token, ptr nocapture readonly) #1 | ||
declare i1 @llvm.coro.end(ptr, i1, token) #2 | ||
declare ptr @llvm.coro.subfn.addr(ptr nocapture readonly, i8) #1 | ||
declare ptr @malloc(i64) | ||
|
||
attributes #0 = { presplitcoroutine "target-features"="+tail-call" } | ||
attributes #1 = { argmemonly nounwind readonly } | ||
attributes #2 = { nounwind } | ||
attributes #3 = { nounwind readnone } |
55 changes: 55 additions & 0 deletions
55
llvm/test/Instrumentation/InstrProfiling/Coro/coro-split-musttail11.ll
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@ | ||
; Tests that instrumentation doesn't interfere with lowering (coro-split). | ||
; It should convert coro.resume followed by a suspend to a musttail call. | ||
|
||
; RUN: opt < %s -passes='pgo-instr-gen,cgscc(coro-split),simplifycfg,early-cse' -S | FileCheck %s | ||
|
||
target triple = "wasm32-unknown-unknown" | ||
|
||
define void @f() #0 { | ||
entry: | ||
%id = call token @llvm.coro.id(i32 0, ptr null, ptr null, ptr null) | ||
%alloc = call ptr @malloc(i64 16) #3 | ||
%vFrame = call noalias nonnull ptr @llvm.coro.begin(token %id, ptr %alloc) | ||
|
||
%save = call token @llvm.coro.save(ptr null) | ||
%addr1 = call ptr @llvm.coro.subfn.addr(ptr null, i8 0) | ||
call fastcc void %addr1(ptr null) | ||
|
||
%suspend = call i8 @llvm.coro.suspend(token %save, i1 false) | ||
switch i8 %suspend, label %exit [ | ||
i8 0, label %await.ready | ||
i8 1, label %exit | ||
] | ||
await.ready: | ||
%save2 = call token @llvm.coro.save(ptr null) | ||
%addr2 = call ptr @llvm.coro.subfn.addr(ptr null, i8 0) | ||
call fastcc void %addr2(ptr null) | ||
|
||
%suspend2 = call i8 @llvm.coro.suspend(token %save2, i1 false) | ||
switch i8 %suspend2, label %exit [ | ||
i8 0, label %exit | ||
i8 1, label %exit | ||
] | ||
exit: | ||
call i1 @llvm.coro.end(ptr null, i1 false, token none) | ||
ret void | ||
} | ||
|
||
; CHECK: musttail call | ||
|
||
declare token @llvm.coro.id(i32, ptr readnone, ptr nocapture readonly, ptr) #1 | ||
declare i1 @llvm.coro.alloc(token) #2 | ||
declare i64 @llvm.coro.size.i64() #3 | ||
declare ptr @llvm.coro.begin(token, ptr writeonly) #2 | ||
declare token @llvm.coro.save(ptr) #2 | ||
declare ptr @llvm.coro.frame() #3 | ||
declare i8 @llvm.coro.suspend(token, i1) #2 | ||
declare ptr @llvm.coro.free(token, ptr nocapture readonly) #1 | ||
declare i1 @llvm.coro.end(ptr, i1, token) #2 | ||
declare ptr @llvm.coro.subfn.addr(ptr nocapture readonly, i8) #1 | ||
declare ptr @malloc(i64) | ||
|
||
attributes #0 = { presplitcoroutine "target-features"="+tail-call" } | ||
attributes #1 = { argmemonly nounwind readonly } | ||
attributes #2 = { nounwind } | ||
attributes #3 = { nounwind readnone } |
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
how is suspend lowered? will a tail call be inserted in the dest BB?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
IIUC,
llvm.coro.suspend
is really a marker that says "return. Upon resumption, here's where you go if there's more to execute, and here's where you go if we're done". So it's not really a call, and the switch isn't really a switch, and the "default" path of the switch really needs to reduce toret
.Adding @GorNishanov to check my understanding.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
...or @Flakebi
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
llvm.coro.suspend
is lowered to either 0 in.resume
function or 1 in .destroy/.cleanup function.When
await_suspend
returns a handle, we always want the following call to its.resume
function to be a tail call in order to have symmetric transfer to work.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Right, and moreover the
-1
case should reduce toret
, correct?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Technically, it depends on the frontend. For C++, yes.
The fancy part here is that symmetric transfer is a C++ feature. We just tried to implement it in the middle end. (This is not good. I know). So we can only consider C++ since the motivation of the patch to save symmetric transfer under pgo.