Skip to content

Clarify code checking for UMD exports... #9897

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
3 commits merged into from
Sep 14, 2016
Merged

Clarify code checking for UMD exports... #9897

Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
aded015
Clarify code checking for UMD exports and eagerly return `undefined` …
Jul 22, 2016
b58f4dd
Respond to PR comments
Jul 22, 2016
715d3f2
Merge branch 'master' into umd_export
Sep 13, 2016
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
15 changes: 9 additions & 6 deletions src/compiler/checker.ts
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -17713,14 +17713,17 @@ namespace ts {
const parentSymbol = getParentOfSymbol(symbol);
if (parentSymbol) {
if (parentSymbol.flags & SymbolFlags.ValueModule && parentSymbol.valueDeclaration.kind === SyntaxKind.SourceFile) {
const symbolFile = <SourceFile> parentSymbol.valueDeclaration;
Copy link
Member

@DanielRosenwasser DanielRosenwasser Jul 22, 2016 •
edited
Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No space after type assertions (@weswigham can you write this rule? 😄 )

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I could. ;)

const referenceFile = getSourceFileOfNode(node);
// If `node` accesses an export and that export isn't in the same file, then symbol is a namespace export, so return undefined.
if (parentSymbol.valueDeclaration === getSourceFileOfNode(node)) {
return <SourceFile>parentSymbol.valueDeclaration;
}
const symbolIsUmdExport = symbolFile !== referenceFile;
return symbolIsUmdExport ? undefined : symbolFile;
}
for (let n = node.parent; n; n = n.parent) {
if ((n.kind === SyntaxKind.ModuleDeclaration || n.kind === SyntaxKind.EnumDeclaration) && getSymbolOfNode(n) === parentSymbol) {
return <ModuleDeclaration | EnumDeclaration>n;
else {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What does this else add apart from nesting?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The old version of this code fell through when it shouldn't have, so as part of removing the fallthrough I turned it into an if-else. If you think the nesting is too much I'll change it back.

for (let n = node.parent; n; n = n.parent) {
if ((n.kind === SyntaxKind.ModuleDeclaration || n.kind === SyntaxKind.EnumDeclaration) && getSymbolOfNode(n) === parentSymbol) {
return <ModuleDeclaration | EnumDeclaration>n;
}
}
}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Explicitly return undefined

}
Expand Down