Add ArkType to userTests #185
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
jakebailey
reviewed
Jan 27, 2025
jakebailey
approved these changes
Jan 27, 2025
|
Awesome, thanks for your help! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
@jakebailey mentioned about a year ago that I should add
arktypeto this repo after some breaking changes cropped up after a TS release.arktypeis very thoroughly tested at a type-level and includes some unique logic that might help identify changes that other libraries in this repo may not reflect.That said, credit to the team- in the couple years I've been maintaining it, there have only been a handful of regressions that were relatively easy to address between changes on my end and patches to TS 🙇
Hopefully that stability will continue, but I figured with 2.0 being released, may as well know earlier on this time in case something goes awry!