MONGOCRYPT-534 Fix type detection: No trying to guess the type of 'uint64_t' #567
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
addaleax
approved these changes
Feb 10, 2023
kevinAlbs
changed the title
kevinAlbs
approved these changes
Feb 10, 2023
rcsanchez97
approved these changes
Feb 10, 2023
rcsanchez97
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 10, 2023
…nt64_t' (#567) * No dancing around 'long' vs 'long long' * (Debian packaging) Drop remove-builtin.patch, integrated upstream --------- Co-authored-by: Kyle Kloberdanz <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Instead, rely on
unsigned long longbeing the same size asuint64_t, and just do theclzllon that value.