Skip to content

Grouping static checks under the same task #1526

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Oct 14, 2024

Conversation

nhachicha
Copy link
Contributor

@@ -34,4 +34,4 @@ fi
echo "Running Kotlin tests"

./gradlew -version
./gradlew kotlinCheck -Dorg.mongodb.test.uri=${MONGODB_URI} ${MULTI_MONGOS_URI_SYSTEM_PROPERTY}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah!this is probably why kotlinCheck was added as a task. Here nothing will run as there is no task passed to gradlew.

A couple of options could be:

  1. Keep kotlinCheck and only depend on test tasks
  2. List all the kotlin projects and the tasks you want to run:
./gradlew bson-kotlin:test bson-kotlinx:test driver-kotlin-sync:test driver-kotlin-sync:integrationTest ...

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think 2 is more explicit/readable about what we want to test 👍

@nhachicha nhachicha self-assigned this Oct 8, 2024
@nhachicha nhachicha requested review from rozza and vbabanin October 8, 2024 21:48
@jyemin jyemin removed the request for review from vbabanin October 11, 2024 18:07
Copy link
Member

@rozza rozza left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One last recommended change then LGTM

@nhachicha nhachicha requested a review from rozza October 14, 2024 13:07
Copy link
Member

@rozza rozza left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@nhachicha nhachicha merged commit 7ade570 into mongodb:kotlin-extensions Oct 14, 2024
51 of 59 checks passed
@nhachicha nhachicha deleted the JAVA-5633 branch October 14, 2024 15:30
nhachicha added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 2, 2024
* Grouping all static checks under the "check" task

JAVA-5633
nhachicha added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 2, 2024
* Helper methods and extensions to improve kotlin interop. (#1478)

Adds a new package `org.mongodb.mongodb-driver-kotlin-extensions`. Its both, kotlin driver and bson kotlin implementation agnostic. Can be used with any combination of `bson-kotlin`, `bson-kotlinx`, `mongodb-driver-kotlin-sync` and `mongodb-driver-kotlin-coroutine`.

Initial Filters extensions support, with both inflix and nested helpers eg:

```
import com.mongodb.kotlin.client.model.Filters.eq

// infix
Person::name.eq(person.name)

// nested
val bson = eq(Person::name, person.name)
```

Also adds path based support which works with vairous annotations on the data class: `@SerialName("_id")`, `@BsonId`, `@BsonProperty("_id")`:

```
(Restaurant::reviews / Review::score).path() == "reviews.rating"
```

JAVA-5308 JAVA-5484

* Gradle: Support custom header annotation

* Added since annotation to Filters.kt

JAVA-5308

* Adding Kotlin extensions methods for projection. (#1515)

* Adding Kotlin extensions methods for projection. Fixes JAVA-5603

---------

Co-authored-by: Ross Lawley <[email protected]>

* Adding Kotlin extensions methods for updates   (#1529)

* Adding Kotlin extension function for Updates operations
JAVA-5601

* Grouping static checks under the same task (#1526)

* Grouping all static checks under the "check" task

JAVA-5633

* Add extension methods for Indexes (#1532)

JAVA-5604

* Adding extension methods for Sorts (#1533)

JAVA-5602

* Adding extensions for Aggregators and Accumulators (#1562)

* Adding extensions for Aggregators and Accumulators

---------

Co-authored-by: Ross Lawley <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Ross Lawley <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants