Skip to content

fix(filesystem): make async_scan asynchronous #618

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 22, 2022
Merged

fix(filesystem): make async_scan asynchronous #618

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 22, 2022

Conversation

musjj
Copy link
Contributor

@musjj musjj commented Nov 22, 2022

Replace uv.fs_scandir and uv.fs_scandir_next with their async alternatives, uv.fs_opendir and uv.fs_readdir

Fix: #609

Replace `uv.fs_scandir` and `uv.fs_scandir_next` with their async alternatives, `uv.fs_opendir` and `uv.fs_readdir`

Fix: #609
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 22, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #618 (5fa7e1a) into main (290c84a) will decrease coverage by 0.02%.
The diff coverage is 81.81%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #618      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   50.47%   50.45%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files          47       47              
  Lines        6092     6099       +7     
==========================================
+ Hits         3075     3077       +2     
- Misses       3017     3022       +5     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
lua/neo-tree/sources/filesystem/lib/fs_scan.lua 72.44% <81.81%> (+0.49%) ⬆️
lua/neo-tree/sources/filesystem/init.lua 64.40% <0.00%> (-1.70%) ⬇️

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@cseickel cseickel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, thanks!

@cseickel cseickel merged commit e003910 into nvim-neo-tree:main Nov 22, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants