Skip to content

[FEATURE] Named provider metadata accessor #714

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
beeme1mr opened this issue Dec 11, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #715
Closed

[FEATURE] Named provider metadata accessor #714

beeme1mr opened this issue Dec 11, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #715
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@beeme1mr
Copy link
Member

Requirements

Add support for accessing provider metadata for named providers. If a name is invalid, the default provider metadata should be returned.

@beeme1mr beeme1mr added the enhancement New feature or request label Dec 11, 2023
@beeme1mr beeme1mr self-assigned this Dec 11, 2023
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 12, 2023
## This PR

- adds an accessor for named provider metadata

### Related Issues

Fixes #714 

### Notes

The default metadata is returned if the name doesn't match a registered
provider.

This is another example where provider namespace would work well. It
doesn't make sense to call this "named client" since we are only
interested in the client.

---------

Signed-off-by: Michael Beemer <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Todd Baert <[email protected]>
toddbaert added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 11, 2024
## This PR

- adds an accessor for named provider metadata

### Related Issues

Fixes #714 

### Notes

The default metadata is returned if the name doesn't match a registered
provider.

This is another example where provider namespace would work well. It
doesn't make sense to call this "named client" since we are only
interested in the client.

---------

Signed-off-by: Michael Beemer <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Todd Baert <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant