Skip to content

docs: add signoff flag to contributing doc #366

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 24, 2023
Merged

docs: add signoff flag to contributing doc #366

merged 2 commits into from
Feb 24, 2023

Conversation

beeme1mr
Copy link
Member

This PR

  • add signoff flag to contributing doc

@beeme1mr beeme1mr requested a review from toddbaert as a code owner February 24, 2023 19:55
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 24, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #366 (d654e43) into main (5330825) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

❗ Current head d654e43 differs from pull request most recent head 14bf50a. Consider uploading reports for the commit 14bf50a to get more accurate results

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #366   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.67%   99.67%           
=======================================
  Files          15       15           
  Lines        1246     1246           
  Branches       97       97           
=======================================
  Hits         1242     1242           
  Misses          4        4           

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

Signed-off-by: Michael Beemer <[email protected]>
@beeme1mr beeme1mr merged commit 87786d7 into main Feb 24, 2023
lukas-reining pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 29, 2023
@beeme1mr beeme1mr deleted the beeme1mr-patch-1 branch February 5, 2025 21:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants