Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

opentelemetry-api: review get_logger documentation #4507

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

xrmx
Copy link
Contributor

@xrmx xrmx commented Mar 26, 2025

Description

Fixes #4318

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration

  • Test A

Does This PR Require a Contrib Repo Change?

  • Yes. - Link to PR:
  • No.

Checklist:

  • Followed the style guidelines of this project
  • Changelogs have been updated
  • Unit tests have been added
  • Documentation has been updated

@xrmx xrmx requested a review from a team as a code owner March 26, 2025 10:44
@xrmx xrmx added the Skip Changelog PRs that do not require a CHANGELOG.md entry label Mar 26, 2025
@@ -162,29 +162,29 @@ def get_logger(
) -> Logger:
"""Returns a `Logger` for use by the given instrumentation library.

For any two calls it is undefined whether the same or different
`Logger` instances are returned, even for different library names.
Calls with the same arguments should return the same `Logger` instance.
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this does not match what the sdk is doing though

Copy link
Member

@emdneto emdneto Mar 28, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do you mean there's something wrong with the logic previously implemented by #4208 ?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I mean this #4318 (comment)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Skip Changelog PRs that do not require a CHANGELOG.md entry
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Logs API: LoggerProvider docs issues
3 participants