Example of using fine-tuned model in fine-tuning docs doesn't work with current release. #31
Comments
|
Sorry, had some environment collisions. |
pull bot
referenced
this issue
in mcx/openai-python
Oct 10, 2021
* Support model-based (/engineless) completions in openai cli (#31) * Engineless completions in the SDK * Cosmetic improvements to fine tuning CLI * Remove done TODO * Raise error if neither engine nor model provided * Undocument the `timeout` parameter on completions, because it doesn't do anything and causes user confusion. * Move things around * Update message * Some day we should care about versions * Minor version bump
cgayapr
pushed a commit
to cgayapr/openai-python
that referenced
this issue
Dec 14, 2024
* Support model-based (/engineless) completions in openai cli (openai#31) * Engineless completions in the SDK * Cosmetic improvements to fine tuning CLI * Remove done TODO * Raise error if neither engine nor model provided * Undocument the `timeout` parameter on completions, because it doesn't do anything and causes user confusion. * Move things around * Update message * Some day we should care about versions * Minor version bump
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Currently using openai-0.10.2 from pypi and gettting
InvalidRequestError: Must provide an 'engine' parameter to create a <class 'openai.api_resources.completion.Completion'>even though docs say explicitly not to provide engine.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: