Skip to content

8354180: Clean up uses of ObjectMonitor caches #24545

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 7 commits into from

Conversation

coleenp
Copy link
Contributor

@coleenp coleenp commented Apr 9, 2025

This is mostly changes from @xmas92 as explained to me plus small cleanup to a read_caches function.
Tested with tier1-4.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8354180: Clean up uses of ObjectMonitor caches (Bug - P4)

Reviewers

Contributors

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/24545/head:pull/24545
$ git checkout pull/24545

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/24545
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/24545/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 24545

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 24545

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24545.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Apr 9, 2025

👋 Welcome back coleenp! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 9, 2025

@coleenp This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8354180: Clean  up uses of ObjectMonitor caches

Co-authored-by: Axel Boldt-Christmas <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: aboldtch, fbredberg

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 163 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title 8354180: Clean up uses of ObjectMonitor caches 8354180: Clean up uses of ObjectMonitor caches Apr 9, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 9, 2025

@coleenp The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@coleenp
Copy link
Contributor Author

coleenp commented Apr 9, 2025

/contributor add @xmas92

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 9, 2025

@coleenp
Contributor Axel Boldt-Christmas <[email protected]> successfully added.

@coleenp coleenp marked this pull request as ready for review April 9, 2025 19:14
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Apr 9, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Apr 9, 2025

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@xmas92 xmas92 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Apr 10, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@fbredber fbredber left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The code looks good to me. Locking code is rarely self-explanatory, so therefore I really like the added value of the new comments. Thanks!

@coleenp
Copy link
Contributor Author

coleenp commented Apr 11, 2025

Thanks for reviewing Axel and Fredrik.
/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 11, 2025

Going to push as commit 9ead2b7.
Since your change was applied there have been 163 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Apr 11, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Apr 11, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Apr 11, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 11, 2025

@coleenp Pushed as commit 9ead2b7.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@coleenp coleenp deleted the cachesetter branch April 11, 2025 13:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot [email protected] integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants