Skip to content

8354216: Small cleanups relating to Log.DiagnosticHandler #24553

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

archiecobbs
Copy link
Contributor

@archiecobbs archiecobbs commented Apr 9, 2025

This is split off as a sub-task of JDK-8224228, which seeks to add @SuppressWarnings support for lexical features.

There are a few of small refactoring cleanups possible relating to the nested class Log.DiagnosticHandler.

First, this class is currently declared as a static inner class with an explicit field reference to its outer class (Log) instance. Although protected and non final, this field really should never be changed. Therefore, there is no reason not to just make DiagnosticHandler a non-static inner class. This will slightly simplify the code and eliminate an obscure corner case by which a bug could possibly occur someday.

Secondly, the deferred diagnostics are currently stored in a linked list, and in cases where they must be sorted before being reported, they have to be copied into an array first. A simpler and more space efficient approach would be to just use an ArrayList. Then the sorting variant of the method can just sort the list in place and delegate directly to the non-sorting variant.

Finally, the code can be simplified by replacing a null filter predicate with an always true predicate at construction time instead of at filter time.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8354216: Small cleanups relating to Log.DiagnosticHandler (Sub-task - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/24553/head:pull/24553
$ git checkout pull/24553

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/24553
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/24553/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 24553

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 24553

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24553.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Apr 9, 2025

👋 Welcome back acobbs! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 9, 2025

@archiecobbs This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8354216: Small cleanups relating to Log.DiagnosticHandler

Reviewed-by: mcimadamore

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 786 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Apr 9, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 9, 2025

@archiecobbs The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • compiler
  • kulla

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Apr 9, 2025

Webrevs

Copy link
Contributor

@mcimadamore mcimadamore left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Apr 10, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Apr 10, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Apr 10, 2025
@archiecobbs
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks for the review!

@archiecobbs
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 10, 2025

Going to push as commit 4890b74.
Since your change was applied there have been 795 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Apr 10, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Apr 10, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Apr 10, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 10, 2025

@archiecobbs Pushed as commit 4890b74.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants