Skip to content

8358107: Rollback JDK-8357299 changeset #25537

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

mrserb
Copy link
Member

@mrserb mrserb commented May 30, 2025

The patch for JDK-8357299 does not completely fix the regression it was intended to address. Instead of bailing out on overflow, it introduces additional logic around src and clip, which might lead to attempts to draw invalid source pixels.

A test case demonstrating the issue is attached to JDK-8358103(passed on jdk22 failed on latest openjdk/jdk).

There are some unresolved discussions related to that patch, see PR. I believe it would be better to bail out early in case of overflow than risk incorrect calculations.

Therefore, I propose reverting JDK-8357299 until a proper fix is available. This approach would also simplify backports, since only the patch for JDK-8358103 would need to be backported

@prsadhuk, @prrace please take a look


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8358107: Rollback JDK-8357299 changeset (Bug - P3)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/25537/head:pull/25537
$ git checkout pull/25537

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/25537
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/25537/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 25537

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 25537

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25537.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@mrserb mrserb marked this pull request as ready for review May 30, 2025 04:11
@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented May 30, 2025

👋 Welcome back serb! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 30, 2025

@mrserb This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8358107: Rollback JDK-8357299 changeset

Reviewed-by: psadhukhan

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been no new commits pushed to the master branch. If another commit should be pushed before you perform the /integrate command, your PR will be automatically rebased. If you prefer to avoid any potential automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label May 30, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 30, 2025

@mrserb The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • client

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented May 30, 2025

Webrevs

@prsadhuk
Copy link
Contributor

prsadhuk commented May 30, 2025

A test case demonstrating the issue is attached to JDK-8358103(passed on jdk22 failed on latest openjdk/jdk).

I believe this new testcase is also failing with jdk24.0.1 too where UNSAFE_TO_ADD macro was added for overflow check and caused JDK-8357299 issue so both testcase is failing with jdk24.0.1 and with current fix, the older BrokenBounds.java testcase will pass in jdk25
but if you feel the earlier bailout is better than this, then it's ok.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label May 30, 2025
@mrserb
Copy link
Member Author

mrserb commented May 31, 2025

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 31, 2025

Going to push as commit d9d00d3.
Since your change was applied there have been 24 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label May 31, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this May 31, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels May 31, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 31, 2025

@mrserb Pushed as commit d9d00d3.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@mrserb mrserb deleted the JDK-8358107 branch May 31, 2025 00:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
client [email protected] integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants