Skip to content

8330598: java/net/httpclient/Http1ChunkedTest.java fails with java.util.MissingFormatArgumentException: Format specifier '%s' #3523

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

GoeLin
Copy link
Member

@GoeLin GoeLin commented Apr 23, 2025

I backport this for parity with 17.0.16-oracle


Progress

  • JDK-8330598 needs maintainer approval
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8330598: java/net/httpclient/Http1ChunkedTest.java fails with java.util.MissingFormatArgumentException: Format specifier '%s' (Bug - P4 - Approved)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/3523/head:pull/3523
$ git checkout pull/3523

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/3523
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/3523/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 3523

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 3523

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/3523.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Apr 23, 2025

👋 Welcome back goetz! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 23, 2025

@GoeLin This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8330598: java/net/httpclient/Http1ChunkedTest.java fails with java.util.MissingFormatArgumentException: Format specifier '%s'

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 2 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • d132468: 8325680: Uninitialised memory in deleteGSSCB of GSSLibStub.c:179
  • 18d5503: 8321479: java -D-D crashes

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport c9c3c1536880d81ab84d5cb55f4fd0fe3bbf60a2 8330598: java/net/httpclient/Http1ChunkedTest.java fails with java.util.MissingFormatArgumentException: Format specifier '%s' Apr 23, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 23, 2025

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 23, 2025

⚠️ @GoeLin This change is now ready for you to apply for maintainer approval. This can be done directly in each associated issue or by using the /approval command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Apr 23, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Apr 23, 2025

Webrevs

@openjdk openjdk bot added approval ready Pull request is ready to be integrated and removed approval labels Apr 24, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport clean ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant