-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 101
Fix Default Branch Issue on GitOps Comment Event in Github #1918
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix Default Branch Issue on GitOps Comment Event in Github #1918
Conversation
Issue: when a user uses GitOps comment on pushed commit in Github, Head and Base branch is set as `main` in hardcoded string and considered default branch here but default could differ by repos like it could be `master` or `trunk` as well. Fix: use Event.Repository.DefaultBranch field for Head and Base branch value in this case. Signed-off-by: Zaki Shaikh <[email protected]>
heu good catch, which commit implemented that? |
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ var sampleRepo = &github.Repository{ | |||
Login: github.Ptr("owner"), | |||
}, | |||
Name: github.Ptr("reponame"), | |||
DefaultBranch: github.Ptr("defaultbranch"), | |||
DefaultBranch: github.Ptr("main"), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i think there is no test for that right ? ie it doesn't check if the user has set something else than main on their repo and that we are actuallyusing it ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes seems same to mee, that it wasn't used that's why this bug is ignored
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
can we add a test then please?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@chmouel there are already tests for commit comment and branch matches, but the issue was DefaultBranch value of repo wasn't used in test due to hardcoded "main".
|
/lgtm |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
✅ Pull Request Approved
Approval Status:
- Required Approvals: 1
- Current Approvals: 1
👥 Approved By:
Reviewer | Permission | Status |
---|---|---|
@chmouel | admin |
✅ |
📝 Next Steps
- All required checks must pass
- Branch protection rules apply
- Get a maintainer to use the
/merge
command to merge the PR
Thank you for your contributions! 🎉
/rebase |
/merge |
04127aa
into
openshift-pipelines:main
Issue: when a user uses GitOps comment on pushed commit in Github, Head and Base branch is set as
main
in hardcoded string and considered default branch here but default could differ by repos like it could bemaster
ortrunk
as well.Fix: use Event.Repository.DefaultBranch field for Head and Base branch value in this case.
Changes
Submitter Checklist
📝 Ensure your commit message is clear and informative. Refer to the How to write a git commit message guide. Include the commit message in the PR body rather than linking to an external site (e.g., Jira ticket).
♽ Run make test lint before submitting a PR to avoid unnecessary CI processing. Consider installing pre-commit and running pre-commit install in the repository root for an efficient workflow.
✨ We use linters to maintain clean and consistent code. Run make lint before submitting a PR. Some linters offer a --fix mode, executable with make fix-linters (ensure markdownlint and golangci-lint are installed).
📖 Document any user-facing features or changes in behavior.
🧪 While 100% coverage isn't required, we encourage unit tests for code changes where possible.
🎁 If feasible, add an end-to-end test. See README for details.
🔎 Address any CI test flakiness before merging, or provide a valid reason to bypass it (e.g., token rate limitations).
If adding a provider feature, fill in the following details:
(update the documentation accordingly)