Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 1882210: Upgrade OpenShift & K8s API versions #285

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Dec 16, 2020

Conversation

tremes
Copy link
Contributor

@tremes tremes commented Dec 7, 2020

No description provided.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. label Dec 7, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@tremes: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1882210, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.7.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.7.0)
  • bug is in the state NEW, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

In response to this:

Bug 1882210: Upgrade OpenShift & K8s API versions

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Dec 7, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Dec 7, 2020
@tremes
Copy link
Contributor Author

tremes commented Dec 7, 2020

/test insights-operator-e2e-tests

1 similar comment
@tremes
Copy link
Contributor Author

tremes commented Dec 7, 2020

/test insights-operator-e2e-tests

@tremes
Copy link
Contributor Author

tremes commented Dec 7, 2020

/retest

@tremes tremes mentioned this pull request Dec 7, 2020
@tremes
Copy link
Contributor Author

tremes commented Dec 8, 2020

/retest

1 similar comment
@tremes
Copy link
Contributor Author

tremes commented Dec 8, 2020

/retest

@Serhii1011010
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 8, 2020
@tremes
Copy link
Contributor Author

tremes commented Dec 8, 2020

/retest

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

3 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@tremes
Copy link
Contributor Author

tremes commented Dec 8, 2020

/retest

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

8 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@tremes
Copy link
Contributor Author

tremes commented Dec 14, 2020

/test insights-operator-e2e-tests

4 similar comments
@tremes
Copy link
Contributor Author

tremes commented Dec 14, 2020

/test insights-operator-e2e-tests

@tremes
Copy link
Contributor Author

tremes commented Dec 14, 2020

/test insights-operator-e2e-tests

@tremes
Copy link
Contributor Author

tremes commented Dec 14, 2020

/test insights-operator-e2e-tests

@tremes
Copy link
Contributor Author

tremes commented Dec 14, 2020

/test insights-operator-e2e-tests

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

2 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 15, 2020
@tremes
Copy link
Contributor Author

tremes commented Dec 15, 2020

/hold

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Dec 15, 2020
@tremes
Copy link
Contributor Author

tremes commented Dec 15, 2020

/retest

2 similar comments
@tremes
Copy link
Contributor Author

tremes commented Dec 15, 2020

/retest

@tremes
Copy link
Contributor Author

tremes commented Dec 15, 2020

/retest

@tremes
Copy link
Contributor Author

tremes commented Dec 15, 2020

/test e2e-gcp-upgrade

@tremes
Copy link
Contributor Author

tremes commented Dec 16, 2020

/unhold

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Dec 16, 2020
@Serhii1011010
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 16, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Sergey1011010, tremes

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [Sergey1011010,tremes]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 0ab6950 into openshift:master Dec 16, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@tremes: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 1882210 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1882210: Upgrade OpenShift & K8s API versions

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants