OSDOCS-8401: Migrate "ROSA with STS Explained" #67001
Conversation
openshift-ci-robot
added
the
jira/valid-reference
|
@jneczypor: This pull request references OSDOCS-8401 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.15.0" version, but no target version was set. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
1 similar comment
|
@jneczypor: This pull request references OSDOCS-8401 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.15.0" version, but no target version was set. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
openshift-ci
bot
added
the
size/L
|
🤖 Thu Feb 08 19:44:06 - Prow CI generated the docs preview: https://67001--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app |
jneczypor
force-pushed
the
OSDOCS-8401
branch
3 times, most recently
from
935bd63 to
5dbbb5c
Compare
|
@jneczypor: This pull request references OSDOCS-8401 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.15.0" version, but no target version was set. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
jneczypor
force-pushed
the
OSDOCS-8401
branch
2 times, most recently
from
580f735 to
1b2a44f
Compare
jneczypor
force-pushed
the
OSDOCS-8401
branch
from
ae42e00 to
e7b85db
Compare
|
Hi @yuwang-RH - Can I please have QE review of this PR? Thank you! |
|
/lgtm |
|
For the text, just a few suggestions. Otherwise, LGTM! |
bmcelvee
added
the
peer-review-done
jneczypor
force-pushed
the
OSDOCS-8401
branch
from
e7b85db to
187ec7f
Compare
|
New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed. |
|
@jneczypor: This pull request references OSDOCS-8401 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.15.0" version, but no target version was set. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
openshift-merge-robot
added
the
needs-rebase
jneczypor
force-pushed
the
OSDOCS-8401
branch
from
187ec7f to
a0c4531
Compare
openshift-merge-robot
removed
the
needs-rebase
jneczypor
force-pushed
the
OSDOCS-8401
branch
from
00a11bc to
933e153
Compare
jneczypor
force-pushed
the
OSDOCS-8401
branch
from
f19cac4 to
d7b60de
Compare
|
@jneczypor: This pull request references OSDOCS-8401 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.16.0" version, but no target version was set. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
@jneczypor: This pull request references OSDOCS-8401 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.16.0" version, but no target version was set. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
jneczypor
force-pushed
the
OSDOCS-8401
branch
2 times, most recently
from
d2a3e92 to
2c5e58c
Compare
cloud_experts_tutorials/cloud-experts-getting-started/cloud-experts-rosa-sts-explained.adoc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
jneczypor
force-pushed
the
OSDOCS-8401
branch
from
2c5e58c to
c945d94
Compare
jneczypor
force-pushed
the
OSDOCS-8401
branch
from
c945d94 to
ff2f942
Compare
|
@jneczypor: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
bmcelvee
added
SD-docs
|
/cherrypick enterprise-4.14 |
|
/cherrypick enterprise-4.15 |
|
@bmcelvee: new pull request created: #71396 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
@bmcelvee: new pull request created: #71397 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
OSDOCS-8401: Migrate the "ROSA with STS Explained" doc from rosaworkshop.io to the "Tutorials" section of SD documentation.
Version(s):
4.14+
Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSDOCS-8401
Link to docs preview:
https://67001--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-rosa/latest/cloud_experts_tutorials/cloud-experts-getting-started/cloud-experts-rosa-sts-explained
QE review:
Additional information: