Skip to content

OSDOCS-8464: add release notes file to MicroShift 4.15 branch #67345

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 6, 2023

Conversation

ShaunaDiaz
Copy link
Contributor

Version(s):
4.15

Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSDOCS-8464

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • N/A, docs plumbing

Additional information:

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Nov 2, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 2, 2023

@ShaunaDiaz: This pull request references OSDOCS-8464 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.15

Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSDOCS-8464

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • N/A, docs plumbing

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. label Nov 2, 2023
@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link

ocpdocs-previewbot commented Nov 2, 2023

🤖 Updated build preview is available at:
https://67345--docspreview.netlify.app

Build log: https://circleci.com/gh/ocpdocs-previewbot/openshift-docs/31891

@ShaunaDiaz
Copy link
Contributor Author

/label peer-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR label Nov 3, 2023
@ShaunaDiaz
Copy link
Contributor Author

@JoeAldinger Could you also PTAL?

@JoeAldinger JoeAldinger added peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR and removed peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR labels Nov 3, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@JoeAldinger JoeAldinger left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

small stuff, I wasn't sure how much you wanted to carryover and what should be // out, but it otherwise looks good.

@JoeAldinger JoeAldinger removed the peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR label Nov 3, 2023
@JoeAldinger JoeAldinger added this to the Planned for 4.15 GA milestone Nov 3, 2023
@JoeAldinger JoeAldinger added branch/enterprise-4.15 peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR labels Nov 3, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 6, 2023

@ShaunaDiaz: This pull request references OSDOCS-8464 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.15

Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSDOCS-8464

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • N/A, docs plumbing

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@kalexand-rh kalexand-rh closed this Nov 6, 2023
@kalexand-rh kalexand-rh reopened this Nov 6, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 6, 2023

@ShaunaDiaz: This pull request references OSDOCS-8464 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.15

Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSDOCS-8464

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • N/A, docs plumbing

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@ShaunaDiaz
Copy link
Contributor Author

/label merge-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR label Nov 6, 2023
@jeana-redhat jeana-redhat added the merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR label Nov 6, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@jeana-redhat jeana-redhat left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM
/remove-label merge-review-in-progress
/remove-label merge-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR labels Nov 6, 2023
@jeana-redhat jeana-redhat merged commit 5fd47a6 into openshift:enterprise-4.15 Nov 6, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
branch/enterprise-4.15 jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants