Skip to content

OADP 2419 Release Notes and Update Notes fixed #67404

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

CarmiWisemon
Copy link
Contributor

@CarmiWisemon CarmiWisemon commented Nov 6, 2023

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Nov 6, 2023
@CarmiWisemon CarmiWisemon changed the title WIP - OADP 2419 Release Notes fixed WIP - OADP 2419 Release Notes and Update Notes fixed Nov 6, 2023
@kalexand-rh kalexand-rh closed this Nov 6, 2023
@kalexand-rh kalexand-rh reopened this Nov 6, 2023
@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link

ocpdocs-previewbot commented Nov 6, 2023

🤖 Updated build preview is available at:
https://67404--docspreview.netlify.app

Build log: https://circleci.com/gh/ocpdocs-previewbot/openshift-docs/35078

@CarmiWisemon CarmiWisemon force-pushed the oadp2419rnfixed branch 6 times, most recently from b70b69f to c970d55 Compare November 14, 2023 16:05
@CarmiWisemon CarmiWisemon force-pushed the oadp2419rnfixed branch 4 times, most recently from f22f411 to f2ab0ef Compare November 19, 2023 08:46
Copy link

@stillalearner stillalearner left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@CarmiWisemon CarmiWisemon force-pushed the oadp2419rnfixed branch 2 times, most recently from 99956bf to bc1eec2 Compare November 21, 2023 13:31
@CarmiWisemon CarmiWisemon changed the title WIP - OADP 2419 Release Notes and Update Notes fixed OADP 2419 Release Notes and Update Notes fixed Nov 21, 2023
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Nov 21, 2023
@CarmiWisemon CarmiWisemon force-pushed the oadp2419rnfixed branch 2 times, most recently from 842c45c to a8e9a91 Compare November 22, 2023 08:57
@CarmiWisemon
Copy link
Contributor Author

/label OADP
/label peer-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the OADP Label for all OADP PRs label Nov 22, 2023
@CarmiWisemon
Copy link
Contributor Author

/label merge-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR label Nov 28, 2023
@CarmiWisemon
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ousleyp
Thank you for your comments.
I made the changes you requested.
The GA for the release is today.
Please merge the PR today.
Thank you for all of your help!
Carmi

@ousleyp ousleyp added merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR and removed peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR labels Nov 28, 2023
Copy link
Member

@ousleyp ousleyp left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi Carmi, I had not done a full merge review when I made my previous comment. There are still items to resolve before we can merge. Please take a look at my comments/suggestions and let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!

cc @anarnold97 (for awareness - I know the release was imminent)

@ousleyp ousleyp removed merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR labels Nov 29, 2023
@CarmiWisemon CarmiWisemon force-pushed the oadp2419rnfixed branch 3 times, most recently from 583539c to 30d8a05 Compare November 29, 2023 12:12
@CarmiWisemon
Copy link
Contributor Author

/label merge-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR label Nov 29, 2023
@CarmiWisemon
Copy link
Contributor Author

CarmiWisemon commented Nov 29, 2023

@ousleyp
Thank you for your comments and your helpful review.
I have implemented the changes you requested.
Please merge the PR as soon as possible.
Thank you for your help!!!
Carmi

. Change your subscription channel for the OADP Operator from `stable-1.1` to `stable-1.2`.
. Allow time for the Operator and containers to update and restart.

For general Operator upgrade instructions, see xref:../../operators/admin/olm-upgrading-operators.adoc#olm-changing-update-channel_olm-upgrading-operators[Updating installed Operators].
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You can't have an xref in a module. This needs to be in an .Additional resources section in the assembly.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I moved it to the assembly.

. Change your subscription channel for the OADP Operator from `stable-1.2` to `stable-1.3`.
. Allow time for the Operator and containers to update and restart.

For general Operator upgrade instructions, see xref:../../operators/admin/olm-upgrading-operators.adoc#olm-changing-update-channel_olm-upgrading-operators[Updating installed Operators].
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same as in the other module.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done

You must back up your current `DataProtectionApplication` (DPA) configuration.

.Procedure
. Save your current DPA configuration by running the following command:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
. Save your current DPA configuration by running the following command:
* Save your current DPA configuration by running the following command:

----
$ oc get dpa -n openshift-adp -o yaml > dpa.orig.backup
----
. Verify that you saved the values.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Unless you're going to explain how, remove this line and reformat the previous step to comply with the single-step procedure guidelines:

* Save your current DPA configuration by running the following command:


:_mod-docs-content-type: PROCEDURE

[id="converting-dpa-to-the-new-version-1-3-0_{context}"]
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
[id="converting-dpa-to-the-new-version-1-3-0_{context}"]
[id="oapd-converting-dpa-to-new-version-1-3-0_{context}"]

The filename and anchor need to match.


.Procedure
. Click *Operators* → *Installed Operators* and select the OADP Operator.
. Under *Provided APIs*, click *Create instance* in the *DataProtectionApplication* box.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't have the UI, but positional language like "under" is either disallowed or to be avoided. I suspect that the "Highlighting by element" section of the ISG can help remediate this.


[NOTE]
====
In a future version of OADP, the `restic` uploader type will be deprecated and `kopia` will become the default `uploaderType` value.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for not calling out expected versions when this will be deprecated.

@kalexand-rh
Copy link
Contributor

kalexand-rh commented Nov 29, 2023

Your build is failing because of a new check we just enabled. These bugs are all set to the Red Hat Employee security level, so customers can't see them. You can edit the RN text to still talk about the fixes/improvements, if that makes sense, or if the bugs can have an external security setting, you can talk with engineering about removing the security restriction, but you can't include the links as they are.

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OADP-2886
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OADP-2895
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OADP-2869
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OADP-2898
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OADP-2904
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OADP-2907
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OADP-2910
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OADP-2889
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OADP-2892
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OADP-2901
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OADP-3069
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OADP-3084

@kalexand-rh kalexand-rh removed the merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR label Nov 29, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
branch/enterprise-4.13 branch/enterprise-4.14 branch/enterprise-4.15 OADP Label for all OADP PRs peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants